IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/coacre/v30y2013i3p922-924.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Discussion of “Do Political Connections Add Value to Audit Firms? Evidence from IPO Audits in Chinaâ€

Author

Listed:
  • Zhaoyang Gu

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhaoyang Gu, 2013. "Discussion of “Do Political Connections Add Value to Audit Firms? Evidence from IPO Audits in Chinaâ€," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(3), pages 922-924, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:coacre:v:30:y:2013:i:3:p:922-924
    DOI: 10.1111/1911-3846.12032
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12032
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1911-3846.12032?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhifeng Yang, 2013. "Do Political Connections Add Value to Audit Firms? Evidence from IPO Audits in China," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(3), pages 891-921, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. He, Jingbin & Ma, Xinru & Liao, Jingchi, 2021. "Preference for bid time in hybrid auctioned IPOs: Evidence from China," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    2. Yu, Sijia & Zhang, Junrui & Qiu, Meng, 2020. "Political uncertainty and analysts’ forecasts: Evidence from China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 36(C).
    3. Feng Chen & Songlan Peng & Shuang Xue & Zhifeng Yang & Feiteng Ye, 2016. "Do Audit Clients Successfully Engage in Opinion Shopping? Partner‐Level Evidence," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(1), pages 79-112, March.
    4. Xiong, Hao & Hou, Fei & Li, Hanwen & Wang, Huabing, 2020. "Does rice farming shape audit quality: Evidence from signing auditors level analysis," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 403-420.
    5. Liu, Qigui & Tang, Jinghua & Tian, Gary Gang, 2013. "Does political capital create value in the IPO market? Evidence from China," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 23(C), pages 395-413.
    6. Piotroski, Joseph D. & Zhang, Tianyu, 2014. "Politicians and the IPO decision: The impact of impending political promotions on IPO activity in China," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(1), pages 111-136.
    7. Song, Tianyi & Kutsuna, Kenji, 2023. "Venture capital investment and institutional factors: Evidence from China," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    8. Joseph D. Piotroski, 2014. "Financial Reporting Practices of China's Listed Firms," Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Morgan Stanley, vol. 26(3), pages 53-60, September.
    9. Xingqiang Du & Xu Li & Xuejiao Liu & Shaojuan Lai, 2018. "Underwriter–Auditor Relationship and Pre-IPO Earnings Management: Evidence from China," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 152(2), pages 365-392, October.
    10. Wu, Yanling & Tian, Gary Gang, 2021. "Public relations expenditure, media tone, and regulatory decisions," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    11. Kevin Koh & Li Li & Xuejiao Liu & Chunfei Wang, 2023. "The Effect of Audit Partner Diversity on Audit Quality: Evidence from China," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 59(1), pages 340-380, March.
    12. Haozhi Huang & Mingsheng Li & Jing Shi, 2020. "Should Financial Gatekeepers be Publicly Traded?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 164(1), pages 175-200, June.
    13. Huang, Yong & Uchida, Konari & Zha, Daolin, 2016. "Market timing of seasoned equity offerings with long regulative process," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 278-294.
    14. Kuo, Nan-Ting & Li, Shu & Du, Ya-Guang & Lee, Cheng-Few, 2022. "Does individual auditor quality contribute to firm value? Evidence from the market valuation on corporate cash holdings," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 135-153.
    15. Bryan K. Church & Narisa Tianjing Dai & Xi (Jason) Kuang & Xuejiao Liu, 2020. "The Role of Auditor Narcissism in Auditor–Client Negotiations: Evidence from China," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(3), pages 1756-1787, September.
    16. Huacheng Wang & Kangtao Ye & Kai Zhong, 2018. "Accounting research in China: commemorating the 40th anniversary of reform and opening up," Frontiers of Business Research in China, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 1-37, December.
    17. Rui Zhang & Raymond M. K. Wong & Gaoliang Tian & Mohan M. Fonseka, 2021. "Positive spillover effect and audit quality: a study of cancelling China’s dual audit system," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(1), pages 205-239, March.
    18. Xiong, Yan & Zhao, Yan, 2021. "Guanxi, media coverage and IPO approvals: Evidence from China," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    19. Yu Ling Tsai & Hua-Wei Huang, 2020. "Does Convergent-IFRS Adoption in China Increase Audit Fees?," Review of Pacific Basin Financial Markets and Policies (RPBFMP), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 23(01), pages 1-21, March.
    20. Goergen, Marc & Gounopoulos, Dimitrios & Koutroumpis, Panagiotis, 2021. "Do multiple credit ratings reduce money left on the table? Evidence from U.S. IPOs," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:coacre:v:30:y:2013:i:3:p:922-924. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1911-3846 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.