IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/coacre/v28y2011i3p957-989.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do the Benefits of Reducing Accounting Complexity Persist in Markets Prone to Bubble?

Author

Listed:
  • Jessen L. Hobson

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Jessen L. Hobson, 2011. "Do the Benefits of Reducing Accounting Complexity Persist in Markets Prone to Bubble?," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(3), pages 957-989, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:coacre:v:28:y:2011:i:3:p:957-989
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1911-3846.2011.01089.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.2011.01089.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1911-3846.2011.01089.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. W. Brooke Elliott & Brian T. Gale & Jessen L. Hobson, 2022. "The Joint Influence of Information Push and Value Relevance on Investor Judgments and Market Efficiency," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(3), pages 1049-1083, June.
    2. W. Brooke Elliott & Jessen L. Hobson & Brian J. White, 2015. "Earnings Metrics, Information Processing, and Price Efficiency in Laboratory Markets," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(3), pages 555-592, June.
    3. Martin, Rachel, 2019. "Examination and implications of experimental research on investor perceptions," Journal of Accounting Literature, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 145-169.
    4. Nerissa C. Brown & Brian T. Gale & Stephanie M. Grant, 2022. "How Do Disclosure Repetition and Interactivity Influence Investors’ Judgments?," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(5), pages 1775-1811, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:coacre:v:28:y:2011:i:3:p:957-989. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1911-3846 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.