IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/coacre/v26y2009i1p123-134.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Discussion of "The Audit Committee Oversight Process": Advocating Openness in Accounting Research

Author

Listed:
  • Yves Gendron

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Yves Gendron, 2009. "Discussion of "The Audit Committee Oversight Process": Advocating Openness in Accounting Research," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(1), pages 123-134, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:coacre:v:26:y:2009:i:1:p:123-134
    DOI: 10.1506/car.26.1.4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1506/car.26.1.4
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1506/car.26.1.4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lisa Baudot & Zhongwei Huang & Dana Wallace, 2021. "Stakeholder Perceptions of Risk in Mandatory Corporate Responsibility Disclosure," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 172(1), pages 151-174, August.
    2. Emily E. Griffith, 2020. "Auditors, Specialists, and Professional Jurisdiction in Audits of Fair Values†," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(1), pages 245-276, March.
    3. repec:dau:papers:123456789/7549 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Steven M. Glover & Mark H. Taylor & Yi‐Jing Wu & Ken T. Trotman, 2019. "Mind the Gap: Why Do Experts Have Differences of Opinion Regarding the Sufficiency of Audit Evidence Supporting Complex Fair Value Measurements?†," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(3), pages 1417-1460, September.
    5. André, Kévin & Cho, Charles H. & Laine, Matias, 2018. "Reference points for measuring social performance: Case study of a social business venture," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 660-678.
    6. Malsch, Bertrand & Guénin-Paracini, Henri, 2013. "The moral potential of individualism and instrumental reason in accounting research," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 24(1), pages 74-82.
    7. Dobija Dorota, 2019. "Institutionalizing Corporate Governance Reforms in Poland: External Auditors’ Perspective," Journal of Management and Business Administration. Central Europe, Sciendo, vol. 27(3), pages 28-54, September.
    8. Christine Noël Le maitre & Cathy Krohmer, 2010. "L’éthique est-elle (vraiment) une compétence clef des auditeurs légaux?," Revue Finance Contrôle Stratégie, revues.org, vol. 13(4), pages 75-100., December.
    9. Malsch, Bertrand & Tessier, Sophie, 2015. "Journal ranking effects on junior academics: Identity fragmentation and politicization," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 84-98.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:coacre:v:26:y:2009:i:1:p:123-134. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1911-3846 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.