IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/coacre/v19y2002i4p637-660.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Audit†Firm Tenure and the Quality of Financial Reports

Author

Listed:
  • E. Johnson
  • Inder K. Khurana
  • J. Kenneth Reynolds

Abstract

This study examines whether the length of the relationship between a company and an audit firm (audit†firm tenure) is associated with financial†reporting quality. Using two proxies for financial†reporting quality and a sample of Big 6 clients matched on industry and size, we find that relative to medium audit†firm tenures of four to eight years, short audit†firm tenures of two to three years are associated with lower†quality financial reports. In contrast, we find no evidence of reduced financial†reporting quality for longer audit†firm tenures of nine or more years. Overall, our results provide empirical evidence pertinent to the recurring debate regarding mandatory audit†firm rotation — a debate that has, to date, relied on anecdotal evidence and isolated cases.

Suggested Citation

  • E. Johnson & Inder K. Khurana & J. Kenneth Reynolds, 2002. "Audit†Firm Tenure and the Quality of Financial Reports," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(4), pages 637-660, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:coacre:v:19:y:2002:i:4:p:637-660
    DOI: 10.1506/LLTH-JXQV-8CEW-8MXD
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1506/LLTH-JXQV-8CEW-8MXD
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1506/LLTH-JXQV-8CEW-8MXD?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:coacre:v:19:y:2002:i:4:p:637-660. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1911-3846 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.