IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/camsys/v3y2007i1p1-95.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Treatment Foster Care for Improving Outcomes in Children and Young People

Author

Listed:
  • Geraldine M. MacDonald
  • William Turner

Abstract

Treatment foster care (‘TFC’) is a promising, individually tailored program for children and youth who are at risk of placement in restrictive settings. The results of this Campbell/Cochrane review suggests that TFC can lead to a reduction in antisocial and criminal behaviour, time spent in locked settings and absconsions. There is some evidence of a positive impact on school attendance and homework completion. Program developers conducted all five studies. The authors recommend that independent researchers also conduct research. Abstract Background Treatment foster care (TFC) is a foster family‐based intervention that aims to provide young people (and, where appropriate, their families) with a tailored programme designed to effect positive changes in their lives. TFC was designed specifically to cater for the needs of children whose difficulties or circumstances place them at risk of multiple placements and/or more restrictive placements such as hospital or secure residential or youth justice settings. Objectives To assess the impact of TFC on psychosocial and behavioural outcomes, delinquency, placement stability, and discharge status for children and adolescents who require out‐of‐home placement. Search strategy We searched the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (CENTRAL) 2006 (Issue 4), MEDLINE (1966 to January 2007), CINAHL (1982 to December 2006), PsycINFO (1872 to January 2007), ASSIA (1987 to January 2007), LILACS (1982 to January 2007), ERIC (1966 to January 2007), Sociological Abstracts (1963 to January 2007), and the National Research Register 2006 (Issue 4). Selection criteria Included studies were randomised controlled trials investigating the effectiveness of TFC with children and young people up to the age of 18 who, for reasons of severe medical, social, psychological and behavioural problems, were placed in out of home care in restrictive settings (e.g. secure residential care, psychiatric hospital) or at risk of placement in such settings. Data collection & analysis Titles and abstracts identified in the search were independently assessed for eligibility by the two authors (GM and WT) who also extracted and entered into REVMAN. Date were synthesised on the few occasions where this was possible. Results are presented in tabular, graphical (forest plots) and textual form. Main results Five studies including 390 participants were included in this review. Data suggest that treatment foster care may be a useful intervention for children and young people with complex emotional, psychological and behavioural need, who are at risk of placements in non‐family settings that restrict their liberty and opportunities for social inclusion. Reviewers’ conclusions Although the inclusion criteria for this systematic review set a study design threshold higher than that of previous reviews, the results mirror those of earlier reviews but also highlight the tendency of the perceived effectiveness of popular interventions to outstrip their evidence base. Whilst the results of individual studies generally indicate that TFC is a promising intervention for children and youth experiencing mental health problems, behavioural problems or problems of delinquency, the evidence base is less robust than that usually reported.

Suggested Citation

  • Geraldine M. MacDonald & William Turner, 2007. "Treatment Foster Care for Improving Outcomes in Children and Young People," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 3(1), pages 1-95.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:camsys:v:3:y:2007:i:1:p:1-95
    DOI: 10.4073/csr.2007.9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.4073/csr.2007.9
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.4073/csr.2007.9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:camsys:v:3:y:2007:i:1:p:1-95. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1891-1803 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.