IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/camsys/v2y2006i1p1-56.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Effectiveness of Incarceration‐Based Drug Treatment on Criminal Behavior

Author

Listed:
  • Ojmarrh Mitchell
  • David B. Wilson
  • Doris L. MacKenzie
  • Submitted to the Campbell Collaboration, Criminal Justice Review Group

Abstract

This Campbell Review evaluates the effects of four different approaches to drug abuse treatment for incarcerated offenders in relation to criminal behaviour and relapse into drug abuse. It also examines what characterises the effective programmes. The findings of this research review are based on a meta‐analysis of 66 independent assessments. These are part of 53 studies which include more than 165,000 offenders (one assessment included more than 95,000 offenders). 58 studies were carried out in the USA, three in Australia, three in Canada, one in Taiwan and one in the UK. The treatment of incarcerated drug abusers can reduce recidivism by up to 20% . However, there are major differences in how the various types of treatment work, both with regard to avoiding relapse into crime and continued drug abuse. Therapeutic communities have a positive effect on both criminal behaviour and drug abuse. Counselling programmes only reduce recidivism, but do not appear to be equally effective for all types of offenders. Other types of treatment – narcotic maintenance programmes (e.g. methadone treatment) and boot camps – do not appear to reduce recidivism. This research review emphasises the need for more insight into which specific parts of a treatment programme are the most important. It is the conclusion of this review that future research should be based on the application of the strictest requirements for the chosen assessment design.

Suggested Citation

  • Ojmarrh Mitchell & David B. Wilson & Doris L. MacKenzie & Submitted to the Campbell Collaboration, Criminal Justice Review Group, 2006. "The Effectiveness of Incarceration‐Based Drug Treatment on Criminal Behavior," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2(1), pages 1-56.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:camsys:v:2:y:2006:i:1:p:1-56
    DOI: 10.4073/csr.2006.11
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.4073/csr.2006.11
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.4073/csr.2006.11?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kunitz, S.J. & Woodall, W.G. & Zhao, H. & Wheeler, D.R. & Lillis, R. & Rogers, E., 2002. "Rearrest rates after incarceration for DWI: A comparative study in a Southwestern US county," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 92(11), pages 1826-1831.
    2. Shaw, James W. & Mackenzie, Doris L., 1992. "The one-year community supervision performance of drug offenders and Louisiana DOC-identified substance abusers graduating from shock incarceration," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 20(6), pages 501-516.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Benda, Brent B. & Toombs, Nancy J. & Whiteside, Leanne, 1996. "Recidivism among boot camp graduates: A comparison of drug offenders to other offenders," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 24(3), pages 241-253.
    2. Benda, Brent B. & Toombs, Nancy J., 1997. "Testing the deviance syndrome perspective among boot camp participants," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 25(5), pages 409-423.
    3. Bourns, William & Veneziano, Carol & Veneziano, Louis, 2005. "A study of criminal justice policymakers' perspectives: The forgotten component in boot camp programs and goals," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 113-118.
    4. Patrice Villettaz & Martin Killias & Isabel Zoder, 2006. "The Effects of Custodial vs. Non‐Custodial Sentences on Re‐Offending: A Systematic Review of the State of Knowledge," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2(1), pages 1-69.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:camsys:v:2:y:2006:i:1:p:1-56. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1891-1803 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.