IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/apsmbi/v35y2019i2p260-269.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is reliability a new science? A paper from the panel session held at the 10th International Conference on Mathematical Methods in Reliability

Author

Listed:
  • Nozer D. Singpurwalla
  • Vitali Volovoi
  • Mark Brown
  • Erol A. Peköz
  • Sheldon M. Ross
  • William Q. Meeker

Abstract

The 10th International Conference on Mathematical Methods in Reliability, MMR 2017, held in Grenoble, France during July 3‐7, entailed a panel discussion entitled “Is reliability a new science?” with Mark Brown, Regina Liu, William Meeker, Sheldon Ross, and Nozer Singpurwalla as panelists. Bill Meeker also doubled as a chair and as a moderator of the panel. The panel discussion was spawned by the recent appearance of a book by Professor Paolo Rocchi, Docent Emeritus of IBM, titled “Reliability is a new science: Gnedenko was right” published by Springer in 2017. The panel discussion was well attended and enthusiastically received and could serve as a forerunner to other such panel discussions at future MMR conferences. This paper presents some elements from the lively debate generated by this discussion.

Suggested Citation

  • Nozer D. Singpurwalla & Vitali Volovoi & Mark Brown & Erol A. Peköz & Sheldon M. Ross & William Q. Meeker, 2019. "Is reliability a new science? A paper from the panel session held at the 10th International Conference on Mathematical Methods in Reliability," Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 35(2), pages 260-269, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:apsmbi:v:35:y:2019:i:2:p:260-269
    DOI: 10.1002/asmb.2442
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/asmb.2442
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/asmb.2442?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:apsmbi:v:35:y:2019:i:2:p:260-269. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1526-4025 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.