IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/apsmbi/v33y2017i6p662-673.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The choice of screening design

Author

Listed:
  • John Tyssedal
  • Muhammad Azam Chaudhry

Abstract

A screening design is an experimental plan used for identifying the expectedly few active factors from potentially many. In this paper, we compare the performances of 3 experimental plans, a Plackett‐Burman design, a minimum run resolution IV design, and a definitive screening design, all with 12 and 13 runs, when they are used for screening and 3 out of 6 factors are active. The functional relationship between the response and the factors was allowed to be of 2 types, a second‐order model and a model with all main effects and interactions included. D‐efficiencies for the designs ability to estimate parameters in such models were computed, but it turned out that these are not very informative for comparing the screening performances of the 2‐level designs to the definitive screening design. The overall screening performance of the 2‐level designs was quite good, but there exist situations where the definitive screening design, allowing both screening and estimation of second‐order models in the same operation, has a reasonable high probability of being successful.

Suggested Citation

  • John Tyssedal & Muhammad Azam Chaudhry, 2017. "The choice of screening design," Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(6), pages 662-673, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:apsmbi:v:33:y:2017:i:6:p:662-673
    DOI: 10.1002/asmb.2269
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/asmb.2269
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/asmb.2269?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nuno Costa & Paulo Fontes, 2020. "Energy-Efficiency Assessment and Improvement—Experiments and Analysis Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-19, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:apsmbi:v:33:y:2017:i:6:p:662-673. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1526-4025 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.