IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/apsmbi/v31y2015i5p732-744.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Failure probability estimation with differently sized reference products for semiconductor burn‐in studies

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel Kurz
  • Horst Lewitschnig
  • Jürgen Pilz

Abstract

A burn‐in study is applied to demonstrate compliance with a targeted early life failure probability of semiconductor products. This is achieved by investigating a sample of the produced chips for reliability‐relevant failures. Usually, a burn‐in study is carried out for a specific reference product with the aim to scale the reference product's failure probability to follower products with different chip sizes. It also appears, however, that there are multiple, differently sized reference products for which burn‐in studies are performed. In this paper, we present a novel model for estimating the failure probability of a chip, which is capable of handling burn‐in studies on multiple reference products. We discuss the model from a combinatorial and a Bayesian perspective; both approaches are shown to provide more accurate estimation results in comparison with a simple area‐based approach. Moreover, we discuss the required modifications of the model if the observed failures are tackled by countermeasures implemented in the chip production process. Finally, the model is applied to the problem of determining the failure probabilities of follower products on the basis of multiple reference products.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel Kurz & Horst Lewitschnig & Jürgen Pilz, 2015. "Failure probability estimation with differently sized reference products for semiconductor burn‐in studies," Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(5), pages 732-744, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:apsmbi:v:31:y:2015:i:5:p:732-744
    DOI: 10.1002/asmb.2100
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/asmb.2100
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/asmb.2100?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:apsmbi:v:31:y:2015:i:5:p:732-744. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1526-4025 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.