IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/apsmbi/v31y2015i5p690-705.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Simple Approach for Multi‐fidelity Experimentation Applied to Financial Engineering

Author

Listed:
  • Shih‐Hsien Tseng
  • Theodore Allen

Abstract

In practical applications, information about the accuracy or ‘fidelity’ of alternative surrogate systems may be ambiguous and difficult to determine. To address this problem, we propose to treat surrogate system fidelity level as a categorical factor in optimal response surface design. To design the associated experiments, we apply the Expected Integrated Mean Squared Error optimal design criterion, which takes into account both variance and bias errors. The performance of the proposed design was compared using three test cases to four types of alternatives using the Empirical Integrated Squared Error. Because of its ability to foster relatively accurate predictions, the proposed design is recommended in fidelity experimental design, particularly when the experimenters lack sufficient information about the fidelity levels of surrogate systems. The method was applied to the case of intraday trading optimization in which data were collected from the Taiwan Futures Exchange. We also calculated the implied volatility from the Merton's Jump‐diffusion model via the fast Fourier transform algorithm with three different models of varying fidelity levels. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Suggested Citation

  • Shih‐Hsien Tseng & Theodore Allen, 2015. "A Simple Approach for Multi‐fidelity Experimentation Applied to Financial Engineering," Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(5), pages 690-705, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:apsmbi:v:31:y:2015:i:5:p:690-705
    DOI: 10.1002/asmb.2075
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/asmb.2075
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/asmb.2075?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:apsmbi:v:31:y:2015:i:5:p:690-705. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1526-4025 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.