IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/apsmbi/v30y2014i3p258-270.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analyzing Risky Choices: Q‐learning for Deal‐No‐Deal

Author

Listed:
  • Laszlo Korsos
  • Nicholas G. Polson

Abstract

In this paper, we derive an optimal strategy for the popular Deal or No Deal game show. To do this, we use Q‐learning methods, which quantify the continuation value inherent in sequential decision making in the game. We then analyze two contestants, Frank and Susanne, risky choices from the European version of the game. Given their choices and our optimal strategy, we find what their implied bounds would be on their levels of risk aversion. Previous empirical evidence in risky decision making has suggested that past outcomes affect future choices and that contestants have time‐varying risk aversion. We demonstrate that the strategies of Frank and Susanne are consistent with constant risk aversion levels except for their final risk‐seeking choice. We conclude with directions for future research. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Suggested Citation

  • Laszlo Korsos & Nicholas G. Polson, 2014. "Analyzing Risky Choices: Q‐learning for Deal‐No‐Deal," Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(3), pages 258-270, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:apsmbi:v:30:y:2014:i:3:p:258-270
    DOI: 10.1002/asmb.1971
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/asmb.1971
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/asmb.1971?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:apsmbi:v:30:y:2014:i:3:p:258-270. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1526-4025 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.