IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/apsmbi/v29y2013i5p454-467.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

T‐optimality and neural networks: a comparison of approaches for building experimental designs

Author

Listed:
  • Rossella Berni
  • Davide De March
  • Federico M. Stefanini

Abstract

This paper deals with optimal experimental design criteria and neural networks in the aim of building experimental designs from observational data. It addresses the following three main issues: (i) the introduction of two radically different approaches, namely T‐optimal designs extended to Generalized Linear Models and Evolutionary Neural Networks Design; (ii) the proposal of two algorithms, based on model selection procedures, to exploit the information of already collected data; and (iii) the comparison of the suggested methods and corresponding algorithms by means of a simulated case study in the technological field.Results are compared by considering elements of the proposed algorithms, in terms of models and experimental design strategies. In particular, we highlight the algorithmic features, the performances of the approaches, the optimal solutions and the optimal levels of variables involved in a simulated foaming process. The optimal solutions obtained by the two proposed algorithms are very similar, nevertheless, the differences between the paths followed by the two algorithms to reach optimal values are substantial, as detailed step‐by‐step in the discussion. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Suggested Citation

  • Rossella Berni & Davide De March & Federico M. Stefanini, 2013. "T‐optimality and neural networks: a comparison of approaches for building experimental designs," Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(5), pages 454-467, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:apsmbi:v:29:y:2013:i:5:p:454-467
    DOI: 10.1002/asmb.1924
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/asmb.1924
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/asmb.1924?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:apsmbi:v:29:y:2013:i:5:p:454-467. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1526-4025 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.