Author
Listed:
- Gaj Vidmar
- Rok Blagus
- Luboš Střelec
- Milan Stehlík
Abstract
Healthcare quality monitoring by the Ministry of Health in Slovenia includes over 100 business indicators of economy, efficiency and funding allocation, which are analysed annually for over 20 hospitals. Most of these indicators are random‐denominator same‐quantity ratios with a strongly correlated numerator and denominator, and the goal is the identification of outliers. A large simulation study was performed to study the performance of three types of methods: common outlier detection tests for small samples—Grubbs, Dean and Dixon, and Nalimov tests—applied unconditionally and conditionally upon results of Shapiro–Wilk normality test; the boxplot rule; and the double‐square‐root control chart, for which we introduced regression‐through‐origin‐based control limits. Pert, Burr and three‐parameter loglogistic distributions, which fitted the real data best, were used with no, one or two outliers in the simulated samples of sizes 5 to 30. Small (below 0.2, right skewed) and large (above 0.5, more symmetrical) ratios were simulated. Performance of the methods varied greatly across the conditions. Formal small‐sample tests proved virtually useless if applied conditionally upon passed normality pre‐test in the presence of outliers. Boxplot rule performed most variedly but was the only useful one for tiny samples. Our variant of the double‐square‐root control chart proved too conservative in tiny samples and too liberal for samples of size 20 or more without outliers but appeared the most useful to detect actual outliers in samples of the latter size. As a possibility for future improvement and research, we propose pre‐testing of normality by using a class of robustified Jarque–Bera tests. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Suggested Citation
Gaj Vidmar & Rok Blagus & Luboš Střelec & Milan Stehlík, 2012.
"Business indicators of healthcare quality: Outlier detection in small samples,"
Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(3), pages 282-295, May.
Handle:
RePEc:wly:apsmbi:v:28:y:2012:i:3:p:282-295
DOI: 10.1002/asmb.905
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:apsmbi:v:28:y:2012:i:3:p:282-295. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1526-4025 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.