IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/apsmbi/v16y2000i3p159-177.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cointegration analysis of brand and category sales: Stationarity and long‐run equilibrium in market shares

Author

Listed:
  • Shuba Srinivasan
  • Frank M. Bass

Abstract

The present study uses modern time series methodology to understand long‐run equilibrium in markets and provides additional evidence of the frequent existence of stationary market shares for frequently purchased consumer products. Dekimpe and Hanssens, Marketing Science 1995; 14(2):G109–121 using a database of over 400 prior studies, found that 78 per cent of the market share series they studied were stationary, but that 68 per cent of the sales series were evolving. Our findings reconcile these results. A major contribution of this paper is its demonstration that the prior empirical evidence that a majority of sales series is in evolution is consistent with stationary market shares, if brand sales and category sales are cointegrated. To the extent that competitive activities have an effect on market share, an implication of our findings is that these activities may, in general, only have a temporary effect on market share. Finally, we distinguish, from a strategic perspective, between sales and share response at the primary‐demand level (category sales), selective‐demand level (brand sales) and relative‐position level (market share) and identify strategic scenarios depending upon their stable/evolving nature. Copyright © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Suggested Citation

  • Shuba Srinivasan & Frank M. Bass, 2000. "Cointegration analysis of brand and category sales: Stationarity and long‐run equilibrium in market shares," Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(3), pages 159-177, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:apsmbi:v:16:y:2000:i:3:p:159-177
    DOI: 10.1002/1526-4025(200007/09)16:33.0.CO;2-R
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/1526-4025(200007/09)16:33.0.CO;2-R
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/1526-4025(200007/09)16:33.0.CO;2-R?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Koen Pauwels, 2004. "How Dynamic Consumer Response, Competitor Response, Company Support, and Company Inertia Shape Long-Term Marketing Effectiveness," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(4), pages 596-610, June.
    2. M.G. Dekimpe & D.M. Hanssens, 2005. "Persistence Models and Marketing Strategy," Review of Business and Economic Literature, KU Leuven, Faculty of Economics and Business (FEB), Review of Business and Economic Literature, vol. 0(5), pages 855-884.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:apsmbi:v:16:y:2000:i:3:p:159-177. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1526-4025 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.