IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/accper/v17y2018i1p89-107.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Canadian Financial Reporting Institutions

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel B. Thornton

Abstract

The recently published Easy Prey Investors: Why Broken Safety Nets Threaten Your Wealth lambastes virtually every aspect of Canadian financial reporting in exceptionally harsh terms. Although the authors' assertions about the implications of financial reporting violations they have seen are mostly unsubstantiated or overblown, publications like theirs are useful if they stimulate continual, thoughtful consideration of Canada's institutional arrangements. I discuss various methodologies for doing this and present some novel evidence indicating that some of the authors' assertions are simply incorrect. Canada's financial reporting institutions, like all institutions, are not perfect, so we must always listen to their critics' suggestions for reforming them; however, our institutions are in much better shape than Easy Prey Investors asserts. Institutions canadiennes du secteur de l'information financière Résumé La récente publication Easy Prey Investors: Why Broken Safety Nets Threaten Your Wealth discrédite pratiquement chaque aspect de l'information financière au Canada en des termes particulièrement sévères. Même si les affirmations des auteurs quant aux conséquences des cas de violation des principes d'information financière qu'ils ont observés ne reposent pour l'essentiel sur aucune preuve, des ouvrages comme le leur sont utiles dans la mesure où ils favorisent le suivi assidu et vigilant des dispositifs institutionnels du Canada. Diverses méthodologies permettant d'effectuer ce suivi sont ici analysées, et des preuves inédites de l'inexactitude manifeste de certaines des assertions des auteurs d'Easy Prey Investors sont avancées. Les institutions canadiennes du secteur de l'information financière, comme toutes les institutions, ne sont pas parfaites ; il nous faut donc demeurer attentifs aux suggestions de réforme que formulent ceux qui les critiquent. Nos institutions sont néanmoins dans un état bien meilleur que ne le prétend Easy Prey Investors.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel B. Thornton, 2018. "Canadian Financial Reporting Institutions," Accounting Perspectives, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(1), pages 89-107, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:accper:v:17:y:2018:i:1:p:89-107
    DOI: 10.1111/1911-3838.12158
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3838.12158
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1911-3838.12158?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gary S. Becker, 1974. "Crime and Punishment: An Economic Approach," NBER Chapters, in: Essays in the Economics of Crime and Punishment, pages 1-54, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Jensen, Michael C, 1986. "Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance, and Takeovers," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 76(2), pages 323-329, May.
    3. Darby, Michael R & Karni, Edi, 1973. "Free Competition and the Optimal Amount of Fraud," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 16(1), pages 67-88, April.
    4. Thornton, Daniel B., 1979. "Information and institutions in the capital market," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 4(3), pages 211-233, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. J. K. Pappalardo, 2022. "Economics of Consumer Protection: Contributions and Challenges in Estimating Consumer Injury and Evaluating Consumer Protection Policy," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 45(2), pages 201-238, June.
    2. Dorfleitner, Gregor & Kreuzer, Christian & Sparrer, Christian, 2022. "To sin in secret is no sin at all: On the linkage of policy, society, culture, and firm characteristics with corporate scandals," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 762-784.
    3. Sergey Belev & Olga Boldareva & Ilya Sokolov & Anna Zolotareva, 2013. "Features of the Public Procurements of Innovation Products in Russian and the World," Published Papers 166, Gaidar Institute for Economic Policy, revised 2013.
    4. Jian Zhang, 2018. "Public Governance and Corporate Fraud: Evidence from the Recent Anti-corruption Campaign in China," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 148(2), pages 375-396, March.
    5. Gabriele Jahn & Matthias Schramm & Achim Spiller, 2005. "The Reliability of Certification: Quality Labels as a Consumer Policy Tool," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 28(1), pages 53-73, December.
    6. Pierre Picard, 2012. "Economic Analysis of Insurance Fraud," Working Papers hal-00725561, HAL.
    7. Lihi Dery & Dror Hermel & Artyom Jelnov, 2021. "Cheating in Ranking Systems," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 58(2), pages 303-320, March.
    8. Pradyot K. Sen, 2007. "Ownership Incentives and Management Fraud," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(7‐8), pages 1123-1140, September.
    9. Bibek Bhatta & Andrew Marshall & Suman Neupane & Chandra Thapa, 2022. "Foreign ownership and the enforcement of corporate governance reforms," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 58(2), pages 541-580, February.
    10. Dong, Wang & Ke, Yun & Li, Shuo & Chen, Xiangyu & Wan, Peng, 2021. "Does social trust restrain excess perk consumption? Evidence from China," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 1078-1092.
    11. Laurence S. Moss, 2010. "Price Theory and the Study of Deception in the Exchange Process," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 69(1), pages 595-628, January.
    12. Ahlin, Christian & Kim, In Kyung & Kim, Kyoo il, 2021. "Who commits fraud? evidence from korean gas stations," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    13. David B. Audretsch & Erik E. Lehmann, 2013. "Corporate governance in newly listed companies," Chapters, in: Mario Levis & Silvio Vismara (ed.), Handbook of Research on IPOs, chapter 9, pages 179-206, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    14. Dino Falaschetti & Michael J. Orlando, 2003. "Is auditor independence endogenous: evidence and implications for public policy," Research Working Paper RWP 03-13, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City.
    15. P. Picard, 1998. "Insurance fraud : theory," THEMA Working Papers 98-26, THEMA (THéorie Economique, Modélisation et Applications), Université de Cergy-Pontoise.
    16. Pouliot, Sébastien, 2012. "On the Economics of Adulteration in Food Imports: Application to US Fish and Seafood Imports," Working Papers 148596, Structure and Performance of Agriculture and Agri-products Industry (SPAA).
    17. Styliani Panetsidou & Angelos Synapis & Ioannis Tsalavoutas, 2022. "Price run-ups and insider trading laws under different regulatory environments," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 59(2), pages 601-639, August.
    18. Dissanaike, Gishan & Drobetz, Wolfgang & Momtaz, Paul P., 2020. "Competition Policy and the Profitability of Corporate Acquisitions," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    19. Dimmock, Stephen G. & Gerken, William C., 2012. "Predicting fraud by investment managers," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(1), pages 153-173.
    20. Julio César Arteaga & Daniel Flores, 2022. "Price Regulation and Fraud—with Special Emphasis on Gasoline Retailing," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 60(2), pages 175-192, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:accper:v:17:y:2018:i:1:p:89-107. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1911-3838 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.