IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wea/econth/v8y2019i1p30.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Was Smith A Moral Subjectivist?

Author

Listed:
  • Kevin Quinn

    (Bowling Green State University, Ohio, USA)

Abstract

This paper challenges the commonly held view that Smith's moral theory is a subjectivist theory. Smith's test for goodness and rightness – for propriety – is not the approbation of an impartial spectator, but the warranted approbation of such a spectator. Something is right or good not because an impartial spectator would approve of it, but because such a spectator would be warranted in so approving.

Suggested Citation

  • Kevin Quinn, 2019. "Was Smith A Moral Subjectivist?," Economic Thought, World Economics Association, vol. 8(1), pages 30-39, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:wea:econth:v:8:y:2019:i:1:p:30
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://et.worldeconomicsassociation.org/papers/was-smith-a-moral-subjectivist/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://et.worldeconomicsassociation.org/files/2019/06/WEA-ET-8-1-Quinn.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jack Russell Weinstein, 2016. "My Understanding of Adam Smith's Impartial Spectator," Econ Journal Watch, Econ Journal Watch, vol. 13(2), pages 351–358-3, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kevin Quinn, 2021. "Knowledge and Humanity: The History of Economic Thought as a Refined Liberal Art," Econ Journal Watch, Econ Journal Watch, vol. 18(1), pages 156–163-1, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wea:econth:v:8:y:2019:i:1:p:30. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jake McMurchie (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/worecea.html .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.