IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/suvges/v26y2016i3p62-73n5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Human Capital Quality and Development: An Employers' and Employees' Comparative Insight

Author

Listed:
  • Neagu Olimpia

    (”Vasile Goldis” Western University of Arad)

  • Lazar Vasile

    (”Vasile Goldis” Western University of Arad)

  • Teodoru Mircea

    (”Vasile Goldis” Western University of Arad)

  • Macarie Simona

    (”Vasile Goldis” Western University of Arad)

Abstract

The aim of the paper is to compare the employers' and employees' insights on human capital quality defining and human capital development at organisational level, based on a survey carried out in the county of Satu Mare, Romania. Our findings show that as human capital buyers, employers understand by human capital quality professional background and skills, professional behaviour and efficiency and productivity for the organisation. As human capital sellers, for employees human capital quality means health and the ability to learn and to be suitable to the job requirements. Regarding the opportunities to develop the organisational human capital, the views of employers and employees are very different when the level of discussion is international (macro-level). Employees consider that the international environment has a greater impact on human capital development in their organisation as the employers.

Suggested Citation

  • Neagu Olimpia & Lazar Vasile & Teodoru Mircea & Macarie Simona, 2016. "Human Capital Quality and Development: An Employers' and Employees' Comparative Insight," Studia Universitatis „Vasile Goldis” Arad – Economics Series, Sciendo, vol. 26(3), pages 62-73, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:suvges:v:26:y:2016:i:3:p:62-73:n:5
    DOI: 10.1515/sues-2016-0015
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/sues-2016-0015
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/sues-2016-0015?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:suvges:v:26:y:2016:i:3:p:62-73:n:5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.