IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/suvges/v25y2015i1p92-107n7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effectiveness of the Various Mechanisms and Practices in Preventing and Resolving Individual Labour Conflicts in Romania

Author

Listed:
  • Braica Alexandra

    (“Vasile Goldis” Western University)

  • Mesaros Serghei

    (Ministry of Labour, Family, Social Protection and Elderly)

Abstract

In our country, the practice of individual labour dispute resolution shows that it predominantly appeals to the courts, to the detriment of alternative mechanisms for individual labour dispute prevention and resolution. Therefore, we believe the focus should be on developing those practices and mechanisms, on the one hand to prevent the emergence of a labour dispute, and on the other hand to steer the conflict settlement through mediation. This paper refers to the existing situation in Romania, in terms of legislation and practice in the field. Promoting programs to increase the institutional capacity of social partners for resolving labour disputes, both individual and collective, would be an approach in accordance with the principles of social dialogue and would really contribute to developing a culture of social dialogue in Romania

Suggested Citation

  • Braica Alexandra & Mesaros Serghei, 2015. "Effectiveness of the Various Mechanisms and Practices in Preventing and Resolving Individual Labour Conflicts in Romania," Studia Universitatis „Vasile Goldis” Arad – Economics Series, Sciendo, vol. 25(1), pages 92-107, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:suvges:v:25:y:2015:i:1:p:92-107:n:7
    DOI: 10.1515/sues-2015-0007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/sues-2015-0007
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/sues-2015-0007?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:suvges:v:25:y:2015:i:1:p:92-107:n:7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.