IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/stintr/v20y2019i3p31-56n7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Outlier Detection In The Analysis Of Nested Gage R&R, Random Effect Model

Author

Listed:
  • Abduljaleel Mohammed

    (Ministry of Electricity, Baghdad, Iraq .)

  • Midi Habshah

    (Department of Applied and Computational Statistics, Institute for Mathematical Research, University Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Selangor, 43400, Malaysia .)

  • Karimi Mostafa

    (Department of Applied and Computational Statistics, Institute for Mathematical Research, University Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Selangor, 43400, Malaysia .)

Abstract

Measurement system analysis is a comprehensive valuation of a measurement process and characteristically includes a specially designed experiment that strives to isolate the components of variation in that measurement process. Gage repeatability and reproducibility is the adequate technique to evaluate variations within the measurement system. Repeatability refers to the measurement variation obtained when one person repeatedly measures the same item with the same Gage, while reproducibility refers to the variation due to different operators using the same Gage. The two factors factorial design, either crossed or nested factor, is usually used for a Gage R&R study. In this study, the focus is only on the nested factor, random effect model. Presently, the classical method (the method of analysing data without taking into consideration the existence of outliers) is used to analyse the nested Gage R&R data. However, this method is easily affected by outliers and, consequently, the measurement system’s capability is also affected. Therefore, the aims of this study are to develop an identification method to detect outliers and to formulate a robust method of measurement analysis of nested Gage R&R, random effect model. The proposed methods of outlier detection are based on a robust mm location and scale estimators of the residuals. The results of the simulation study and real numerical example show that the proposed outlier identification method and the robust estimation method are the most successful methods for the detection of outliers.

Suggested Citation

  • Abduljaleel Mohammed & Midi Habshah & Karimi Mostafa, 2019. "Outlier Detection In The Analysis Of Nested Gage R&R, Random Effect Model," Statistics in Transition New Series, Statistics Poland, vol. 20(3), pages 31-56, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:vrs:stintr:v:20:y:2019:i:3:p:31-56:n:7
    DOI: 10.21307/stattrans-2019-023
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.21307/stattrans-2019-023
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.21307/stattrans-2019-023?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peruchi, Rogério Santana & Balestrassi, Pedro Paulo & de Paiva, Anderson Paulo & Ferreira, João Roberto & de Santana Carmelossi, Michele, 2013. "A new multivariate gage R&R method for correlated characteristics," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(1), pages 301-315.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. de Oliveira, Lucas Guedes & Aquila, Giancarlo & Balestrassi, Pedro Paulo & de Paiva, Anderson Paulo & de Queiroz, Anderson Rodrigo & de Oliveira Pamplona, Edson & Camatta, Ulisses Pessin, 2020. "Evaluating economic feasibility and maximization of social welfare of photovoltaic projects developed for the Brazilian northeastern coast: An attribute agreement analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    2. Mohammed Abduljaleel & Habshah Midi & Mostafa Karimi, 2019. "Outlier Detection In The Analysis Of Nested Gage R&R, Random Effect Model," Statistics in Transition New Series, Polish Statistical Association, vol. 20(3), pages 31-56, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:stintr:v:20:y:2019:i:3:p:31-56:n:7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://stat.gov.pl/en/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.