IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/spotou/v31y2024i3p18-22n1003.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Alternative Methods for Anaerobic Power Assessment in Athletes: A Correlational Study of Wingate, Vertical Jump, and Standing Broad Jump Tests

Author

Listed:
  • Joshi Kunal

    (Guru Nanak Dev University, Department of Sports Science and Medicine, Amritsar, Punjab, India)

  • Singh Ashutosh

    (University of Engineering and Management, Department of Physiotherapy, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India)

Abstract

Introduction. Power plays a vital role in various sporting activities in which the aerobic system produces the most energy. However, anaerobic power is vital when the player demands an immediate energy supply. The primary goal of this study is to determine whether the standing broad jump (SBJ) and vertical jump (VJ) tests can be correlated with those of the Win-gate ergometry test so that a reliable and cost-effective method for athlete monitoring and skill identification is available. Material and Methods. Forty healthy athletes, 26 males and 14 females from different sports, participated in the study. Each participant completed the Wingate, SBJ, and VJ tests in a controlled environment, and the results were analyzed. Results. Pearson’s correlation test showed a positive correlation between peak power and the SBJ distance (r = 0.74, p

Suggested Citation

  • Joshi Kunal & Singh Ashutosh, 2024. "Alternative Methods for Anaerobic Power Assessment in Athletes: A Correlational Study of Wingate, Vertical Jump, and Standing Broad Jump Tests," Polish Journal of Sport and Tourism, Sciendo, vol. 31(3), pages 18-22.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:spotou:v:31:y:2024:i:3:p:18-22:n:1003
    DOI: 10.2478/pjst-2024-0017
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/pjst-2024-0017
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/pjst-2024-0017?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:spotou:v:31:y:2024:i:3:p:18-22:n:1003. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.