IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/repfms/v26y2018i42p77-84n9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Analysis of the Results of Measuring Roundness

Author

Listed:
  • Némedi Imre

    (Subotica Tech – College of Applied Sciences, 24000Subotica, Serbia)

  • Sánta Róbert

    (Subotica Tech – College of Applied Sciences, 24000Subotica, Serbia)

  • Fürstner Igor

    (Subotica Tech – College of Applied Sciences, 24000Subotica, Serbia)

  • Košt’ál Peter

    (Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava, Faculty of Materials Science and Technology in Trnava, Institute of Production Technologies, Ulica Jána Bottu 2781/25, 917 24Trnava, Slovak Republic)

Abstract

Coordinate measuring machines are devised for most complex measurements. Besides their dimension measuring abilities, the CNC operated machines can measure geometrical characteristics of form, such as straightness, roundness, cylindricity, etc. These are vital features currently, when inspection needs to submit very thorough reports not only on the form, but also on the geometrical features of the given workpiece. Yet the question arises: are these measuring data regarding roundness received from the CMM accurate and reliable enough to be exploited? In order to confirm this statement, the geometrical roundness characteristics were measured on three types of coordinate measuring machines, the results of which were analyzed from several aspects. The results showed a special importance of specific measuring parameters and proved to be independent of the type of measuring machines.

Suggested Citation

  • Némedi Imre & Sánta Róbert & Fürstner Igor & Košt’ál Peter, 2018. "Comparative Analysis of the Results of Measuring Roundness," Research Papers Faculty of Materials Science and Technology Slovak University of Technology, Sciendo, vol. 26(42), pages 77-84, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:repfms:v:26:y:2018:i:42:p:77-84:n:9
    DOI: 10.2478/rput-2018-0009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/rput-2018-0009
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/rput-2018-0009?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:repfms:v:26:y:2018:i:42:p:77-84:n:9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.