IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/poicbe/v18y2024i1p1477-1485n1026.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding Public Perception of Internet Security in the European Union

Author

Listed:
  • Vargas Vanesa Madalina

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, Institute for Economic Forecasting, Romanian Academy)

  • Oancea Marian

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania)

  • Teodorescu Cosmin Alexandru

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania)

  • Saftiuc Bogdan Paul

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

This paper presents an extensive analysis of Internet security experiences and perceptions among European Union (EU) citizens, as detailed by data within commented graphics highlighting awareness of online privacy practices, security-related aspects and data tracking methods. The paper also examines the implications of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) regarding businesses operating within the EU and the European Economic Area (EEA). Via a thorough investigation of Internet users' awareness of cookies as tracking tools and the prevalence of security-related incidents, the paper provides insights into the evolving landscape of online privacy and security. It elucidates the challenges and opportunities presented by GDPR compliance for businesses, compliance requirements, spanning core principles and broader implications of data processing practices. The findings mark the imperative to align businesses’ operations with GDPR provisions, addressing key aspects such as consent mechanisms, lawful bases and the importance of robust data security measures. The conclusion reveals the significance derived from the intersection of internet security perceptions, GDPR compliance, and business operations within the EU and EEA. Synthesizing empirical data with regulatory analysis, the paper provides a valuable understanding of the challenges and opportunities within the evolving regulatory landscape, thereby equipping businesses with actionable strategies in order to safeguard data privacy rights and uphold regulatory compliance in the digital age.

Suggested Citation

  • Vargas Vanesa Madalina & Oancea Marian & Teodorescu Cosmin Alexandru & Saftiuc Bogdan Paul, 2024. "Understanding Public Perception of Internet Security in the European Union," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 18(1), pages 1477-1485.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:poicbe:v:18:y:2024:i:1:p:1477-1485:n:1026
    DOI: 10.2478/picbe-2024-0121
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/picbe-2024-0121
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/picbe-2024-0121?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ericka Costa & Caterina Pesci, 2016. "Social impact measurement: why do stakeholders matter?," Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 7(1), pages 99-124, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Viktoriia Myronchuk & Oleksandr Yatsenko & Dmytro Riznyk & Olena Hurina & Andrii Frolov, 2024. "Financing Sustainable Development: Analysis of Modern Approaches and Practices in the Context of Financial and Credit Activities," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 14(5), pages 317-329, September.
    2. Annebeth Roor & Karen Maas, 2024. "Do impact investors live up to their promise? A systematic literature review on (im)proving investments' impacts," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 3707-3732, May.
    3. Leonardo Boni & Laura Toschi & Riccardo Fini, 2021. "Investors’ Aspirations toward Social Impact: A Portfolio-Based Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-20, May.
    4. Fatma Koroglu, 2023. "Social Impact & Project Performance Measurement Methods and Challenges in Practice: A Study on Women Empowerment NGOs," GATR Journals jber232, Global Academy of Training and Research (GATR) Enterprise.
    5. Natasha Layton & Natasha Brusco & Tammy Gardner & Libby Callaway, 2021. "Co-Design of Social Impact Domains with the Huntington’s Disease Community," Disabilities, MDPI, vol. 1(2), pages 1-16, May.
    6. Laura Berardi & Laurie Mook, 2023. "New digital technologies for social impact assessment: Considerations for Italian social economy organizations," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2023(2 Suppl.), pages 109-132.
    7. Pongpan Compan & Chanakamol Kongyok & Thongchai Prommachan & Nuchanart Rodsaard & Mam Socheath, 2024. "Developing and Validating Sustainability Indicators for Measuring Social Impact of University–Community Engagement Programs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-15, June.
    8. Mercedes Luque‐Vílchez & José A. Gómez‐Limón & M. Dolores Guerrero‐Baena & Pablo Rodríguez‐Gutiérrez, 2023. "Deconstructing corporate environmental, social, and governance performance: Heterogeneous stakeholder preferences in the food industry," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(3), pages 1845-1860, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:poicbe:v:18:y:2024:i:1:p:1477-1485:n:1026. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.