Author
Listed:
- Potârniche Marilena E.
(University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania)
- Giucă Andreea Daniela
(University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, giucaandreea16@stud.ase.ro, Research Institute of Agriculture and Rural Developement, Romania)
- Stoica Gabriela Dalila
(University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, stoicagabriela16@stud.ase.ro, Research Institute of Agriculture and Rural Developement, Romania)
- Sterie Cristina Maria
(University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, Research Institute of Agriculture and Rural Developement, Romania)
Abstract
The transition to a circular economy could bring many benefits, such as: Reducing the pressure on the environment, improving the security of supply of raw materials, increasing the competitiveness of businesses, stimulating innovation, boosting economic growth and not least creating new jobs. The aim of the work is to highlight the situation of Romania compared to the Member States of the European Union as regards indicators specific to the circular economy. To achieve this aim, the following indicators have been analyzed: Trade in recyclable raw materials, circular use rate of material, municipal recycling rate, and private investment in circular economy sectors, both at Romanian level and across all EU Member States, in the period 2010-2020. The countries with the largest amounts of recycled raw materials are Germany and the Netherlands with more than 1,5 million tons in 2020 and the country-wide extra-EU trade in recyclable raw materials was 25,2 thousand. The Netherlands, Belgium and France are the leading figures for the use rate of recyclable metals. However, the highest recycling rate was registered by Germany with 67%, with Romania among the last countries.
Suggested Citation
Potârniche Marilena E. & Giucă Andreea Daniela & Stoica Gabriela Dalila & Sterie Cristina Maria, 2022.
"The circular economy in Romania and in the EU Member States,"
Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 16(1), pages 409-419, August.
Handle:
RePEc:vrs:poicbe:v:16:y:2022:i:1:p:409-419:n:6
DOI: 10.2478/picbe-2022-0040
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:poicbe:v:16:y:2022:i:1:p:409-419:n:6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.