IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/poicbe/v16y2022i1p22-30n37.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Formal learning versus empirical learning: which one yields better results?

Author

Listed:
  • Lupulescu Mihnea Grigoraș Gîngioveanu

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

The digital revolution that we are currently experiencing is causing a lot of young people to ask themselves if formal education is still worth it. As the digital environment exponentially evolved in the last couple of years, you can now find almost any curriculum on the internet for a fraction of the price you would pay to study it in a university, or sometimes even free or charge. Furthermore, employers all over the globe are starting to put more emphasis on the experience accumulated by the individual rather than its formal studies, encouraging young people to start working early in their lives. The present paper approached this hypothesis from two different angles: the first part of the paper was focused on individuals in their early “work-life”, more precisely millennials that graduated recently, while the second part of the paper looked at the wealthiest people on the planet, the ones indicated by Forbes Top 30. Insights about how millennials with higher education see work in relation with their formal studies were obtained using a questionnaire, their overall feedback being a positive one, against all previous expectations. Also, interesting patterns emerged from the data about the Forbes Top 30 billionaires after researching their educational backgrounds. As it turns out, financial success is not necessarily correlated with formal studies, but links between high performance / innovative individuals and previous formal studies have been found.

Suggested Citation

  • Lupulescu Mihnea Grigoraș Gîngioveanu, 2022. "Formal learning versus empirical learning: which one yields better results?," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 16(1), pages 22-30, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:vrs:poicbe:v:16:y:2022:i:1:p:22-30:n:37
    DOI: 10.2478/picbe-2022-0005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/picbe-2022-0005
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/picbe-2022-0005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:poicbe:v:16:y:2022:i:1:p:22-30:n:37. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.