IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/poicbe/v16y2022i1p109-120n8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Filling Knowledge Gaps: Communication Characteristics in Traditional Versus Virtual Teams

Author

Listed:
  • Stratone Mădălina Elena

    (Doctoral School in Management National University of Political Studies and Public Administration (SNSPA))

  • Vătămănescu Elena-Mădălina

    (National University of Political Studies and Public Administration (SNSPA))

  • Rusu Mihaela

    (Doctoral School in Communication Sciences National University of Political Studies and Public Administration (SNSPA))

Abstract

Before the Covid-19 pandemic, the body of literature about the transition from the traditional teams to the virtual ones was not very well outlined and spread. However, in the present, the efforts to understand virtual teams and their effectiveness are growing faster and faster. Thus, this paper aims at underlining the main differences between the communication among co-workers within traditional and virtual teams, the differences in terms of communication and job satisfaction when it comes to both traditional and virtual teams and whether there is a positive correlation between communication among co-workers and job satisfaction in traditional teams versus virtual teams. A survey with 135 respondents (with different roles and experiences across different industries) was conducted in order to test the hypotheses formulated within the study and to emphasize which of the two types of teams is more effective.

Suggested Citation

  • Stratone Mădălina Elena & Vătămănescu Elena-Mădălina & Rusu Mihaela, 2022. "Filling Knowledge Gaps: Communication Characteristics in Traditional Versus Virtual Teams," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 16(1), pages 109-120, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:poicbe:v:16:y:2022:i:1:p:109-120:n:8
    DOI: 10.2478/picbe-2022-0011
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/picbe-2022-0011
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/picbe-2022-0011?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:poicbe:v:16:y:2022:i:1:p:109-120:n:8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.