IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/poicbe/v15y2021i1p58-74n24.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The impact of Tesla’s bitcoin investment and its plans to accept it as payment method on the evolution of bitcoin

Author

Listed:
  • Mironeanu Alexandra

    (International Master of Business Administration, Bucharest, Romania)

  • Irimia Beatrice

    (International Master of Business Administration, Bucharest, Romania)

  • Săndulescu Valentina

    (International Master of Business Administration, Bucharest, Romania)

  • Teodoroiu Casiana

    (International Master of Business Administration, Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

For the past years, cryptocurrencies have been a hot and controversial topic that has captured the attention of the whole tech world. Even if right now the portfolio of digital assets is considerable in size, the first cryptocurrency, Bitcoin, exploited its pioneer advantage and managed to remain at the center of attention both for the media and investors. During 2020, one of the most chaotic years, Bitcoin boomed in November 2020 almost doubling since the end of 2019. This boom is the result of a combination of factors, such as the fear of missing out translated into a chain reaction of public and private companies to consider Bitcoin a safe reserve asset, a hedging method against inflation, which represents a substitute for traditional hedging instruments, the infrastructure developed around it over the years, and lastly the hype created by influential figures through news and social media platforms. There have been many public figures that exhibited interest in cryptocurrencies through platforms such as Twitter, for instance Elon Musk, Bill Gates, Kanye West, Hugh Laurie, Mike Tyson and Gwyneth Paltrow are just some in a long list of celebrities that backed Bitcoin. This paper aims to analyze the impact that twitter posts have upon the evolution of Bitcoin, coupled with Tesla’s investment and recent statement of introducing Bitcoin as a method of payment in the near future. Our research tries to determine if the news and social media posts, such as tweets have an influence upon Bitcoin’s volatility and fluctuations.

Suggested Citation

  • Mironeanu Alexandra & Irimia Beatrice & Săndulescu Valentina & Teodoroiu Casiana, 2021. "The impact of Tesla’s bitcoin investment and its plans to accept it as payment method on the evolution of bitcoin," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 15(1), pages 58-74, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:poicbe:v:15:y:2021:i:1:p:58-74:n:24
    DOI: 10.2478/picbe-2021-0007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/picbe-2021-0007
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/picbe-2021-0007?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shen, Dehua & Urquhart, Andrew & Wang, Pengfei, 2019. "Does twitter predict Bitcoin?," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 118-122.
    2. Philippas, Dionisis & Rjiba, Hatem & Guesmi, Khaled & Goutte, Stéphane, 2019. "Media attention and Bitcoin prices," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 37-43.
    3. repec:bla:jfinan:v:59:y:2004:i:3:p:1259-1294 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. ?ikolaos A. Kyriazis, 2021. "Impacts of Stock Indices, Oil, and Twitter Sentiment on Major Cryptocurrencies during the COVID-19 First Wave," Bulletin of Applied Economics, Risk Market Journals, vol. 8(2), pages 133-146.
    2. Yongqiang Meng & Dehua Shen & Xiong Xiong & Jorgen Vitting Andersen, 2020. "A Socio-Finance Model: The Case of Bitcoin," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 20031, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.
    3. Neto, David, 2021. "Are Google searches making the Bitcoin market run amok? A tail event analysis," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    4. Wang, Chen & Shen, Dehua & Li, Youwei, 2022. "Aggregate Investor Attention and Bitcoin Return: The Long Short-term Memory Networks Perspective," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).
    5. Hu, Yitong & Shen, Dehua & Urquhart, Andrew, 2023. "Attention allocation and cryptocurrency return co-movement: Evidence from the stock market," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 1173-1185.
    6. Aysan, Ahmet Faruk & Batten, Jonathan A. & Gozgor, Giray & Khalfaoui, Rabeh & Nanaeva, Zhamal, 2023. "Twitter matters for metaverse stocks amid economic uncertainty," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    7. Koch, Sophia & Dimpfl, Thomas, 2023. "Attention and retail investor herding in cryptocurrency markets," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).
    8. Moser, Stefanie & Brauneis, Alexander, 2023. "Should you listen to crypto YouTubers?," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    9. Ozdamar, Melisa & Sensoy, Ahmet & Akdeniz, Levent, 2022. "Retail vs institutional investor attention in the cryptocurrency market," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    10. Li, Yue & Goodell, John W. & Shen, Dehua, 2021. "Comparing search-engine and social-media attentions in finance research: Evidence from cryptocurrencies," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 723-746.
    11. Mokni, Khaled & Bouteska, Ahmed & Nakhli, Mohamed Sahbi, 2022. "Investor sentiment and Bitcoin relationship: A quantile-based analysis," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    12. Julien Chevallier & Dominique Guégan & Stéphane Goutte, 2021. "Is It Possible to Forecast the Price of Bitcoin?," Forecasting, MDPI, vol. 3(2), pages 1-44, May.
    13. Yongjie Zhang & Yue Li & Dehua Shen, 2022. "Investor Attention and the Carbon Emission Markets in China: A Nonparametric Wavelet-Based Causality Test," Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, Springer;Japanese Association of Financial Economics and Engineering, vol. 29(1), pages 123-137, March.
    14. Oncu, Erdem, 2021. "Investigation of Dogecoin Price Movements: A GSADF Analysis," MPRA Paper 111212, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Andr'es Garc'ia-Medina & Toan Luu Duc Huynh3, 2021. "What drives bitcoin? An approach from continuous local transfer entropy and deep learning classification models," Papers 2109.01214, arXiv.org.
    16. Aharon, David Y. & Demir, Ender & Lau, Chi Keung Marco & Zaremba, Adam, 2022. "Twitter-Based uncertainty and cryptocurrency returns," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    17. Shahzad, Syed Jawad Hussain & Anas, Muhammad & Bouri, Elie, 2022. "Price explosiveness in cryptocurrencies and Elon Musk's tweets," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 47(PB).
    18. Choi, Hyungeun, 2021. "Investor attention and bitcoin liquidity: Evidence from bitcoin tweets," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 39(C).
    19. Lin, Zih-Ying, 2021. "Investor attention and cryptocurrency performance," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 40(C).
    20. Aloosh, Arash & Ouzan, Samuel & Shahzad, Syed Jawad Hussain, 2022. "Bubbles across Meme Stocks and Cryptocurrencies," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:poicbe:v:15:y:2021:i:1:p:58-74:n:24. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.