IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/offsta/v38y2022i4p1145-1175n10.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modeling the Relationship between Proxy Measures of Respondent Burden and Survey Response Rates in a Household Panel Survey

Author

Listed:
  • Earp Morgan

    (U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics, Division of Research and Methodology, 3311 Toledo Rd, Hyattsville, MD, 20782, U.S.A.)

  • Kaplan Robin

    (U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Office of Survey Methods Research, Suite 5930. 2 Massachusetts Ave NE, Washington, DC 20212, U.S.A.)

  • Toth Daniell

    (U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Office of Survey Methods Research, Suite 5930. 2 Massachusetts Ave NE, Washington, DC 20212, U.S.A.)

Abstract

Respondent burden has important implications for survey outcomes, including response rates and attrition in panel surveys. Despite this, respondent burden remains an understudied topic in the field of survey methodology, with few researchers systematically measuring objective and subjective burden factors in surveys used to produce official statistics. This research was designed to assess the impact of proxy measures of respondent burden, drawing on both objective (survey length and frequency), and subjective (effort, saliency, and sensitivity) burden measures on response rates over time in the Current Population Survey (CPS). Exploratory Factor Analysis confirmed the burden proxy measures were interrelated and formed five distinct factors. Regression tree models further indicated that both objective and subjective proxy burden factors were predictive of future CPS response rates. Additionally, respondent characteristics, including employment and marital status, interacted with these burden factors to further help predict response rates over time. We discuss the implications of these findings, including the importance of measuring both objective and subjective burden factors in production surveys. Our findings support a growing body of research suggesting that subjective burden and individual respondent characteristics should be incorporated into conceptual definitions of respondent burden and have implications for adaptive design.

Suggested Citation

  • Earp Morgan & Kaplan Robin & Toth Daniell, 2022. "Modeling the Relationship between Proxy Measures of Respondent Burden and Survey Response Rates in a Household Panel Survey," Journal of Official Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 38(4), pages 1145-1175, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:vrs:offsta:v:38:y:2022:i:4:p:1145-1175:n:10
    DOI: 10.2478/jos-2022-0049
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/jos-2022-0049
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/jos-2022-0049?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bates Nancy, 2017. "The Morris Hansen Lecture: Hard-to-Survey Populations and the U.S. Census: Making Use of Social Marketing Campaigns," Journal of Official Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 33(4), pages 873-885, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:offsta:v:38:y:2022:i:4:p:1145-1175:n:10. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.