IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/offsta/v30y2014i2p20n8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Recruiting an Internet Panel Using Respondent-Driven Sampling

Author

Listed:
  • Schonlau Matthias

    (University of Waterloo, Statistics and Act.Sci.200 University Ave, Waterloo, Ontario N2L3G1, Canada.)

  • Weidmer Beverly

    (RAND Corporation, Survey Research Group, Los Angeles, California, USA.)

  • Kapteyn Arie

    (University of Southern California and RAND Corporation)

Abstract

Respondent-driven sampling (RDS) is a network sampling technique typically employed for hard-to-reach populations when traditional sampling approaches are not feasible (e.g., homeless) or do not work well (e.g., people with HIV). In RDS, seed respondents recruit additional respondents from their network of friends. The recruiting process repeats iteratively, thereby forming long referral chains. RDS is typically implemented face to face in individual cities. In contrast, we conducted Internet-based RDS in the American Life Panel (ALP), a web survey panel, targeting the general US population. We found that when friends are selected at random, as RDS methodology requires, recruiting chains die out. When self-selecting friends, self-selected friends tend to be older than randomly selected friends but share the same demographic characteristics otherwise. Using randomized experiments, we also found that respondents list more friends when the respondent’s number of friends is preloaded from an earlier question. The results suggest that with careful selection of parameters, RDS can be used to select population-wide Internet panels and we discuss a number of elements that are critical for success.

Suggested Citation

  • Schonlau Matthias & Weidmer Beverly & Kapteyn Arie, 2014. "Recruiting an Internet Panel Using Respondent-Driven Sampling," Journal of Official Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 30(2), pages 291-310, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:vrs:offsta:v:30:y:2014:i:2:p:20:n:8
    DOI: 10.2478/jos-2014-0018
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/jos-2014-0018
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/jos-2014-0018?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Daniela Balutel & Walter Engert & Christopher S. Henry & Kim P. Huynh & Marcel Voia, 2024. "Explaining bitcoin ownership in Canada: Trends from 2016 to 2021," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 57(3), pages 777-798, August.
    2. Michaels Stuart & Pineau Vicki & Reimer Becky & Ganesh Nadarajasundaram & Dennis J. Michael, 2019. "Test of a Hybrid Method of Sampling the LGBT Population: Web Respondent Driven Sampling with Seeds from a Probability Sample," Journal of Official Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 35(4), pages 731-752, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Web survey; RDS;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:offsta:v:30:y:2014:i:2:p:20:n:8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.