IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/njopap/v16y2023i2p101-121n10.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Key Criteria Influencing Stakeholders’ Decision-making about PB Continuation: The Case of the Czech Republic

Author

Listed:
  • Kukučková Soňa

    (Department of Finance, Faculty of Business and Economics, Mendel University, Brno, Czech Republic.)

  • Bakoš Eduard

    (Department of Public Economics, Faculty of Economics and Administration, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.)

Abstract

Participatory budgeting (PB) is a modern trend involving citizens in decisions on distributing public resources. Assuming that the identified drawbacks of PB are described as internal and external factors, simple criteria were developed to predict the fate of PB. These criteria reflect stakeholders’ decisions about PB continuation in the future. Using panel data between 2017-2022 from the Czech Republic, it appears that the selected criteria were evaluated as an upgrading process, signalling the continuation of PB. However, this does not mean abandoning the process in the case of downgrading. The results indicate a certain probability for upgrading PB to continue, while the fate of downgrading PB is indeterminate and could depend on other factors. In the case of new governance after an electoral change, using the criteria could help explain the actual situation regarding the interest of stakeholders in PB.

Suggested Citation

  • Kukučková Soňa & Bakoš Eduard, 2023. "Key Criteria Influencing Stakeholders’ Decision-making about PB Continuation: The Case of the Czech Republic," NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, Sciendo, vol. 16(2), pages 101-121, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:njopap:v:16:y:2023:i:2:p:101-121:n:10
    DOI: 10.2478/nispa-2023-0015
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/nispa-2023-0015
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/nispa-2023-0015?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:njopap:v:16:y:2023:i:2:p:101-121:n:10. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.