IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/mtrbid/v45y2023i1p1-8n5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Opportunities for Digitisation of Agricultural and Rural Development Solutions

Author

Listed:
  • Atkočiūnienė Vilma

    (Prof., Dr., Vytautas Magnus University Agriculture Academy)

  • Papšienė Palmira

    (Junior researcher, Vytautas Magnus University Agriculture Academy)

Abstract

Agriculture identification of solution alternatives and their effective implementation require human resources capable of concentrating and systemically setting priorities and performing necessary tasks for realization of ideas. With the help of agricultural digitization, one employee can communicate with several robotic devices at once by sending them specific instructions, thereby synchronizing their work with each other. Such activities in agriculture help to save time and achieve higher productivity. Purpose of the study is to analyse opportunities for digitisation of agricultural and rural development solutions. The focus is on one of the options, the aim is to define how in a digital environment, using decision support systems (DSS), one employee can carry out several jobs and, according to feedback signal, perform their quality monitoring. Using digital technologies in agriculture and rural change management, employees can guarantee that every modern agricultural and rural development management system will start its work on time, perform it qualitatively and finish it on time. An employee can monitor the processes of change in agriculture and rural environment with the help of information technology. With the help of internet technologies and robots, implemented advanced information systems (such as DSS) can collect, analyse and process huge data (metrological, soil conditions, market information, etc.), so one person can perform several jobs at the same time. In order to successfully address the challenges of digitisation of agriculture and rural development, it is proposed to facilitate cooperation between a human (operator) and a robot when they exchange and (or) share tasks, control multifunctional processes, and, according to the obtained results, make changes to the components of the process in order to achieve the best result.

Suggested Citation

  • Atkočiūnienė Vilma & Papšienė Palmira, 2023. "Opportunities for Digitisation of Agricultural and Rural Development Solutions," Management Theory and Studies for Rural Business and Infrastructure Development, Sciendo, vol. 45(1), pages 1-8, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:mtrbid:v:45:y:2023:i:1:p:1-8:n:5
    DOI: 10.15544/mts.2023.01
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.15544/mts.2023.01
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.15544/mts.2023.01?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ara, Iffat & Turner, Lydia & Harrison, Matthew Tom & Monjardino, Marta & deVoil, Peter & Rodriguez, Daniel, 2021. "Application, adoption and opportunities for improving decision support systems in irrigated agriculture: A review," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 257(C).
    2. Robert Finger & Scott M. Swinton & Nadja El Benni & Achim Walter, 2019. "Precision Farming at the Nexus of Agricultural Production and the Environment," Annual Review of Resource Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 11(1), pages 313-335, October.
    3. Mohammad K. Al-nawayseh & Mohammad M. Alnabhan & Mutaz M. Al-Debei & Wamadeva Balachandran, 2013. "An Adaptive Decision Support System for Last Mile Logistics in E-Commerce: A Study on Online Grocery Shopping," International Journal of Decision Support System Technology (IJDSST), IGI Global, vol. 5(1), pages 40-65, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Schroer-Merker, Eva & Westbrooke, Victoria, 2020. "UK agricultural students’ perceptions of future technology use on-farm," Agri-Tech Economics Papers 308134, Harper Adams University, Land, Farm & Agribusiness Management Department.
    2. Ponieman, Karen D. & Bongiovanni, Rodolfo & Battaglia, Martin L. & Hilbert, Jorge A. & Cipriotti, Pablo A. & Espósito, Gabriel, 2023. "Site-specific calculation of corn bioethanol carbon footprint with Life Cycle Assessment," Agri-Tech Economics Papers 344397, Harper Adams University, Land, Farm & Agribusiness Management Department.
    3. Ponieman, Karen D. & Bongiovanni, Rodolfo & Battaglia, Martin L. & Hilbert, Jorge A. & Cipriotti, Pablo A. & Espósito, Gabriel, 2023. "Site-specific calculation of corn bioethanol carbon footprint with Life Cycle Assessment," Land, Farm & Agribusiness Management Department 344397, Harper Adams University, Land, Farm & Agribusiness Management Department.
    4. Shang, Linmei & Heckelei, Thomas & Gerullis, Maria K. & Börner, Jan & Rasch, Sebastian, 2021. "Adoption and diffusion of digital farming technologies - integrating farm-level evidence and system interaction," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    5. Monjardino, Marta & Harrison, Matthew T. & DeVoil, Peter & Rodriguez, Daniel & Sadras, Victor O., 2022. "Agronomic and on-farm infrastructure adaptations to manage economic risk in Australian irrigated broadacre systems: A case study," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    6. Gonzalez-Martinez, Ana & Jongeneel, Roel & Salamon, Petra, 2021. "Lighting on the Road to Explore Future Directions for Agricultural Modelling in the EU – some Considerations on what Needs to be Done," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 12(03), September.
    7. Michael Gbenga Ogungbuyi & Juan P. Guerschman & Andrew M. Fischer & Richard Azu Crabbe & Caroline Mohammed & Peter Scarth & Phil Tickle & Jason Whitehead & Matthew Tom Harrison, 2023. "Enabling Regenerative Agriculture Using Remote Sensing and Machine Learning," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-25, May.
    8. Gackstetter, David & von Bloh, Malte & Hannus, Veronika & Meyer, Sebastian T. & Weisser, Wolfgang & Luksch, Claudia & Asseng, Senthold, 2023. "Autonomous field management – An enabler of sustainable future in agriculture," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    9. Leonie Hart & Elisabeth Quendler & Christina Umstaetter, 2022. "Sociotechnological Sustainability in Pasture Management: Labor Input and Optimization Potential of Smart Tools to Measure Herbage Mass and Quality," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-23, June.
    10. Galaz, Victor & Centeno, Miguel A. & Callahan, Peter W. & Causevic, Amar & Patterson, Thayer & Brass, Irina & Baum, Seth & Farber, Darryl & Fischer, Joern & Garcia, David & McPhearson, Timon & Jimenez, 2021. "Artificial intelligence, systemic risks, and sustainability," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    11. Ning Wang & Yingying Xing & Xiukang Wang, 2019. "Exploring Options for Improving Potato Productivity through Reducing Crop Yield Gap in Loess Plateau of China Based on Grey Correlation Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-14, October.
    12. Friedrich Rübcke von Veltheim & Heinke Heise, 2020. "The AgTech Startup Perspective to Farmers Ex Ante Acceptance Process of Autonomous Field Robots," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-18, December.
    13. Wu, Zitao & Zhai, Haibo, 2021. "Consumptive life cycle water use of biomass-to-power plants with carbon capture and sequestration," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 303(C).
    14. Beatrice Garske & Antonia Bau & Felix Ekardt, 2021. "Digitalization and AI in European Agriculture: A Strategy for Achieving Climate and Biodiversity Targets?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-21, April.
    15. Gourav Sharma & Swati Shrestha & Sudip Kunwar & Te-Ming Tseng, 2021. "Crop Diversification for Improved Weed Management: A Review," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-17, May.
    16. Niklas Widderich & Natalie Mayer & Anna Joelle Ruff & Bernd Reckels & Florian Lohkamp & Christian Visscher & Ulrich Schwaneberg & Martin Kaltschmitt & Andreas Liese & Paul Bubenheim, 2022. "Conditioning of Feed Material Prior to Feeding: Approaches for a Sustainable Phosphorus Utilization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-20, March.
    17. Nawab Khan & Ram L. Ray & Hazem S. Kassem & Muhammad Ihtisham & Badar Naseem Siddiqui & Shemei Zhang, 2022. "Can Cooperative Supports and Adoption of Improved Technologies Help Increase Agricultural Income? Evidence from a Recent Study," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-18, March.
    18. Guo, Shibo & Zhao, Jin & Zhao, Chuang & Guo, Erjing & Liu, Zhijuan & Harrison, Matthew Tom & Liu, Ke & Zhang, Tianyi & Yang, Xiaoguang, 2024. "Adapting crop land-use in line with a changing climate improves productivity, prosperity and reduces greenhouse gas emissions," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    19. Sergei Schaub & Nadja El Benni, 2024. "How do price (risk) changes influence farmers’ preferences to reduce fertilizer application?," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 55(2), pages 365-383, March.
    20. Kopp, Thomas & Nabernegg, Markus & Lange, Steffen, 2023. "The net climate effect of digitalization, differentiating between firms and households," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    digitization; decision support systems; agricultural and rural development;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O15 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Economic Development: Human Resources; Human Development; Income Distribution; Migration
    • Q1 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:mtrbid:v:45:y:2023:i:1:p:1-8:n:5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.