IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/mtrbid/v43y2021i1p161-171n13.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Innovative Development: Model and Evaluation Method in the Context of Integration Processes

Author

Listed:
  • Diatlova Valentyna

    (Prof. Dr. Sc. (Econ), Donetsk State University of Management. Karpinskoho str. 58. 87513. Mariupol. Ukraine. Phone Number +380951582533)

  • Diatlova Yuliia

    (Assoc. Prof. Dr. Sc. (Econ), Donetsk State University of Management. Karpinskoho str. 58. 87513. Mariupol. Ukraine. Phone Number +380500471466)

  • Petryk Iryna

    (PhD student, Donetsk State University of Management. Karpinskoho str. 58. 87513. Mariupol. Ukraine. Phone Number +380983707845)

  • Hutareva Yuliia

    (PhD of Econ., Odessa National Polytechnic University. Shevchenko av. 1. 65044. Odessa. Ukraine. Phone Number +380676011785)

  • Zubro Tetyana

    (Assis. Prof. PhD, University of Economics in Bratislava. Dolnozemská cesta. 1. 85235. Bratislava. Slovakia. Phone Number +421902658030)

  • Tyshchenko Olena

    (Assoc. Prof. PhD of Econ., Volodymyr Dahl East Ukrainian National University. Tsentralnyi Prospect. 59-а. 93406. Severodonetsk. Ukraine. Phone Number +380508559681)

Abstract

Development in the modern world is based on innovation. Many scientists are investigating the problem of innovative development. Most researches agree that innovation is the main driving force for economic and society development, solving environmental problems. The transition to an innovative development model is a priority issue for many countries. Ukraine is no exception, in which the national innovation system has just begun to form. This determines the relevance of the research. The aim of the article is to substantiate the methodological approach to assessing the socioecological and economic system of the country in the conditions of innovative development. In our opinion, the modern trajectory of innovative development is ensured not only by the presence of a national innovation system, but also by the innovativeness of the all sphere of country’s vital activity, the main components of which are the social, ecological and economic systems. The innovativeness of the systems is proposed to be evaluated as an integral indicator, which is calculated of certain indices. The list of indices for economic, social and ecological systems is offered. The EU values with the best result were used as standard. The complex indicator are calculated of integral indicators and allows determining the position of Ukraine in comparison with the EU countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Diatlova Valentyna & Diatlova Yuliia & Petryk Iryna & Hutareva Yuliia & Zubro Tetyana & Tyshchenko Olena, 2021. "Innovative Development: Model and Evaluation Method in the Context of Integration Processes," Management Theory and Studies for Rural Business and Infrastructure Development, Sciendo, vol. 43(1), pages 161-171, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:mtrbid:v:43:y:2021:i:1:p:161-171:n:13
    DOI: 10.15544/mts.2021.14
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.15544/mts.2021.14
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.15544/mts.2021.14?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lionel Nesta & Francesco Vona & Francesco Nicolli, 2012. "Environmental Policies, Product Market Regulation and Innovation in Renewable Energy," Working Papers 2012.90, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    2. Magnus Holmen & Mats Magnusson & Maureen McKelvey, 2007. "What are Innovative Opportunities?," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(1), pages 27-45.
    3. Nesta, Lionel & Vona, Francesco & Nicolli, Francesco, 2014. "Environmental policies, competition and innovation in renewable energy," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 67(3), pages 396-411.
    4. Gillian Bristow & Adrian Healy, 2018. "Innovation and regional economic resilience: an exploratory analysis," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 60(2), pages 265-284, March.
    5. Alvarez-Herranz, Agustin & Balsalobre-Lorente, Daniel & Shahbaz, Muhammad & Cantos, José María, 2017. "Energy innovation and renewable energy consumption in the correction of air pollution levels," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 386-397.
    6. repec:rnp:artcls:dud5 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Li, Changsheng & Shen, Bo, 2019. "Accelerating renewable energy electrification and rural economic development with an innovative business model: A case study in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 280-286.
    8. Dudin, Mikhail & Ljasnikov, Nikolaj & Sekerin, Vladimir & Veselovsky, Mikhail & Aleksakhina, Vera, 2014. "The Problem of Forecasting and Modelling of the Innovative Development of Social-Economic Systems and Structures," Published Papers dud5, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hille, Erik & Althammer, Wilhelm & Diederich, Henning, 2020. "Environmental regulation and innovation in renewable energy technologies: Does the policy instrument matter?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    2. Aldieri, Luigi & Bruno, Bruna & Makkonen, Teemu & Vinci, Concetto Paolo, 2023. "Environmental innovations, geographically mediated knowledge spillovers, economic and environmental performance," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    3. Xie, Peijun & Jamaani, Fouad, 2022. "Does green innovation, energy productivity and environmental taxes limit carbon emissions in developed economies: Implications for sustainable development," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 66-78.
    4. Lee, Chien-Chiang & He, Zhi-Wen & Xiao, Fu, 2022. "How does information and communication technology affect renewable energy technology innovation? International evidence," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 546-557.
    5. Zeeshan Khan & Muhsin Ali & Dervis Kirikkaleli & Salman Wahab & Zhilun Jiao, 2020. "The impact of technological innovation and public‐private partnership investment on sustainable environment in China: Consumption‐based carbon emissions analysis," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(5), pages 1317-1330, September.
    6. Shahbaz, Muhammad & Raghutla, Chandrashekar & Song, Malin & Zameer, Hashim & Jiao, Zhilun, 2020. "Public-private partnerships investment in energy as new determinant of CO2 emissions: The role of technological innovations in China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    7. Cheng, Yuanyuan & Yao, Xin, 2021. "Carbon intensity reduction assessment of renewable energy technology innovation in China: A panel data model with cross-section dependence and slope heterogeneity," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    8. jiemin, Huang & chen, Wen, 2022. "The impact of private sector energy investment, innovation and energy consumption on China's carbon emissions," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 1291-1299.
    9. Fabio Antoniou & Roland Strausz, 2014. "The Effectiveness of Taxation and Feed-in Tariffs," CESifo Working Paper Series 4788, CESifo.
    10. Zhangsheng Liu & Liuqingqing Yang & Liqin Fan, 2021. "Induced Effect of Environmental Regulation on Green Innovation: Evidence from the Increasing-Block Pricing Scheme," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-15, March.
    11. Marino, Marianna & Parrotta, Pierpaolo & Valletta, Giacomo, 2019. "Electricity (de)regulation and innovation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(3), pages 748-758.
    12. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/2qaasbmk6u8cj8maoa30ls1roi is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Eric Jondeau & Gregory Levieuge & Jean-Guillaume Sahuc & Gauthier Vermandel, 2022. "Environmental Subsidies to Mitigate Transition Risk," Swiss Finance Institute Research Paper Series 22-45, Swiss Finance Institute.
    14. Grafström, Jonas & Poudineh, Rahmat, 2023. "No evidence of counteracting policy effects on European solar power invention and diffusion," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    15. Verdolini, Elena & Vona, Francesco & Popp, David, 2018. "Bridging the gap: Do fast-reacting fossil technologies facilitate renewable energy diffusion?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 242-256.
    16. David Popp & Jacquelyn Pless & Ivan Haščič & Nick Johnstone, 2020. "Innovation and Entrepreneurship in the Energy Sector," NBER Chapters, in: The Role of Innovation and Entrepreneurship in Economic Growth, pages 175-248, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    17. Tolliver, Clarence & Keeley, Alexander Ryota & Managi, Shunsuke, 2020. "Policy targets behind green bonds for renewable energy: Do climate commitments matter?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    18. Wei Chen & Yongle Tian & Kaiming Zheng & Nana Wan, 2023. "Influences of mechanisms on investment in renewable energy storage equipment," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(11), pages 12569-12595, November.
    19. Marin, Giovanni & Vona, Francesco, 2023. "Finance and the reallocation of scientific, engineering and mathematical talent," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(5).
    20. repec:spo:wpecon:info:hdl:2441/f6h8764enu2lskk9p544jc8op is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Lionel Nesta & Elena Verdolini & Francesco Vona, 2018. "Threshold policy effects and directed technical change in Energy Innovation," SciencePo Working papers Main hal-03475570, HAL.
    22. Jose García‐Quevedo & Elisenda Jové‐Llopis & Ester Martínez‐Ros, 2020. "Barriers to the circular economy in European small and medium‐sized firms," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(6), pages 2450-2464, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    complex indicator; evaluation method; indices; innovative development; integral indicator; model of basic systems; socio-ecological-economic system innovativeness; integration processes;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O11 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Macroeconomic Analyses of Economic Development
    • O30 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:mtrbid:v:43:y:2021:i:1:p:161-171:n:13. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.