Author
Listed:
- Keller Veronika
(Széchenyi István University Faculty of Economics Department of Corporate Leadership and Marketing, 9026 Győr; Egyetem square 1., Hungary)
- Ercsey Ida
(Széchenyi István University Faculty of Economics, 9026 Győr; Egyetem square 1., Hungary)
- Printz-Markó Erzsébet
(Széchenyi István University Faculty of Economics Department of Tourism and Hospitality, 9026 Győr; Egyetem square 1., Hungary)
Abstract
The most common health-related apps are lifestyle apps, i.e., fitness, nutrition, diet, and meditation apps, which account for half of all m-health apps on the market. Mobile app-based interventions have been shown to be effective in improving diet-related health outcomes. The aim of this study is to map the usage patterns of lifestyle apps (fitness, diet, and relaxation apps) and identify the role of each factor in the usability of MAUQ (m-Health App Usability Questionnaire) factor - ease of use, interface satisfaction, and usefulness - in overall satisfaction. Data were collected through an online survey in Hungary with 348 users of various lifestyle applications, i.e., fitness (30.2%), nutrition (31.3%), and mindfulness (38.5%) apps. Respondents showed a preference for free apps over paid ones and predominantly used iOS operating systems. The partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) method was used to identify the role of usability dimensions in overall satisfaction. The satisfaction of lifestyle app users is positively influenced by ‘Ease of Use’ and ‘Interface and Satisfaction’. However, effectiveness (positive physical and mental health outcomes) negatively influences satisfaction. Research can be particularly useful for app developers, as usability and design (features) play a particularly important role in satisfaction, so these are primary considerations in development.
Suggested Citation
Keller Veronika & Ercsey Ida & Printz-Markó Erzsébet, 2024.
"Evaluation criteria for lifestyle applications – The role of MAUQ factors in satisfaction,"
Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 19(3), pages 498-519.
Handle:
RePEc:vrs:manmar:v:19:y:2024:i:3:p:498-519:n:1006
DOI: 10.2478/mmcks-2024-0022
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:manmar:v:19:y:2024:i:3:p:498-519:n:1006. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.