IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/manmar/v15y2020is1p439-457n3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Resilience measures to dealing with the COVID-19 pandemic Evidence from Romanian micro and small enterprises

Author

Listed:
  • Păunescu Carmen

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, UNESCO Department for Business Administration, Bucharest, Romania)

  • Mátyus Enikő

    (Association of Small and Medium Sized Enterprises from Covasna County, Sfântu Gheorghe, Romania)

Abstract

COVID-19 has created an un-precedent crisis for SMEs and challenged each single enterprise to reconsider its business operations and to adapt to the new unexpected circumstances. The present paper aims to explore the resilience measures that the micro and small enterprises in Romania can consider to dealing with the disruptions caused by the pandemic. A questionnaire-based survey was used to collect data from a sample of micro and small enterprises operating in the central part of the country. An exploratory factor analysis was employed to identify underlying variables that explain the pattern of correlations between the resilience measures for enterprises, which help them cope with the pandemic effects. There are seventeen resilience measures to the pandemic included in the analysis and further tested in the paper. In addition, a multiple linear regression was conducted to determine which of the resilience measures has the most impact on the enterprises’ overcoming illness. The results show that in order for the micro and small enterprises to better cope with the disruption caused by the COVID-19 pandemic they should demonstrate, on the first place, openness to production innovation and adaptation and ensure a strong support for customers and communities. On the second place, efforts should be directed toward ensuring efficiency of their internal operational management and worker protection. While there exist external circumstances that lead enterprises to adopt several resilience measures to better respond to the pandemic, the motivations that are most relevant in this decision are generally internal in nature.

Suggested Citation

  • Păunescu Carmen & Mátyus Enikő, 2020. "Resilience measures to dealing with the COVID-19 pandemic Evidence from Romanian micro and small enterprises," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 15(s1), pages 439-457, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:manmar:v:15:y:2020:i:s1:p:439-457:n:3
    DOI: 10.2478/mmcks-2020-0026
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/mmcks-2020-0026
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/mmcks-2020-0026?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Committee for the Coordination of Statistical Activities, 2020. "How COVID-19 is Changing the World," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 33773.
    2. Sahebjamnia, Navid & Torabi, S. Ali & Mansouri, S. Afshin, 2018. "Building organizational resilience in the face of multiple disruptions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 197(C), pages 63-83.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yingqi Liu & Ruijun Chen & Fei Zhou & Shuang Zhang & Juan Wang, 2021. "Analysis of the Influencing Factors of Organizational Resilience in the ISM Framework: An Exploratory Study Based on Multiple Cases," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-24, December.
    2. Yuan, Ruizhi & Luo, Jun & Liu, Martin J. & Yu, Jiang, 2022. "Understanding organizational resilience in a platform-based sharing business: The role of absorptive capacity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 85-99.
    3. Antonio Miceli & Birgit Hagen & Maria Pia Riccardi & Francesco Sotti & Davide Settembre-Blundo, 2021. "Thriving, Not Just Surviving in Changing Times: How Sustainability, Agility and Digitalization Intertwine with Organizational Resilience," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-17, February.
    4. Galym Tokazhanov & Aidana Tleuken & Mert Guney & Ali Turkyilmaz & Ferhat Karaca, 2020. "How is COVID-19 Experience Transforming Sustainability Requirements of Residential Buildings? A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-20, October.
    5. Libertad Moreno-Luna & Rafael Robina-Ramírez & Marcelo Sánchez-Oro Sánchez & José Castro-Serrano, 2021. "Tourism and Sustainability in Times of COVID-19: The Case of Spain," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-21, February.
    6. Abramiuc Todoran Teodora & Popa Raluca Andreea, 2021. "Rethinking leadership models after COVID-19," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 15(1), pages 494-504, December.
    7. Malgorzata Slawinska & Sebastian Kubasinski, 2021. "Designing the Conditions for the Proactive Attitude of Employees to Increase Organizational Resilience," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 5), pages 697-708.
    8. Safinaz H. Abourokbah & Reem M. Mashat & Mohammad Asif Salam, 2023. "Role of Absorptive Capacity, Digital Capability, Agility, and Resilience in Supply Chain Innovation Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-25, February.
    9. Mohammad Najarian & Gino J. Lim, 2019. "Design and Assessment Methodology for System Resilience Metrics," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(9), pages 1885-1898, September.
    10. Haibo Chen & Zongjun Wang & Xuesong Yu & Qin Zhong, 2022. "Research on the Anti-Risk Mechanism of Mask Green Supply Chain from the Perspective of Cooperation between Retailers, Suppliers, and Financial Institutions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-18, December.
    11. Hosseini, Seyedmohsen & Ivanov, Dmitry & Dolgui, Alexandre, 2019. "Review of quantitative methods for supply chain resilience analysis," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 285-307.
    12. Ahmad Jafari Ghezelhesar & Ali Bozorgi-Amiri, 2022. "A novel approach to selection of resilient measures portfolio under disruption and uncertainty: a case study of e-payment service providers," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(5), pages 5477-5527, November.
    13. Hajkowicz, Stefan & Bratanova, Alexandra & Schleiger, Emma & Brosnan, A, 2020. "Global trade and investment megatrends," MPRA Paper 113240, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. P. Siva Kumar & Ramesh Anbanandam, 2020. "Theory Building on Supply Chain Resilience: A SAP–LAP Analysis," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 21(2), pages 113-133, June.
    15. Cecil Ash & Uday Venkatadri & Claver Diallo & Peter Vanberkel & Ahmed Saif, 2023. "PPE Supply Optimization Under Risks of Disruption from the COVID-19 Pandemic," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 4(2), pages 1-29, June.
    16. Changcheng Kan & Qiwei Ma & Zhaoya Gong & Yuanjing Qi & Anrong Dang, 2022. "The Recovery of China’s Industrial Parks in the First Wave of COVID-19," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-15, November.
    17. Liang, Lin & Li, Yan, 2024. "How does organizational resilience promote firm growth? The mediating role of strategic change and managerial myopia," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    18. Vasilii Erokhin & Tianming Gao, 2020. "Impacts of COVID-19 on Trade and Economic Aspects of Food Security: Evidence from 45 Developing Countries," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-28, August.
    19. Ruijun Chen & Yaping Xie & Yingqi Liu, 2021. "Defining, Conceptualizing, and Measuring Organizational Resilience: A Multiple Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-25, February.
    20. Lin Liang & Yan Li, 2023. "The double‐edged sword effect of organizational resilience on ESG performance," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(6), pages 2852-2872, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:manmar:v:15:y:2020:i:s1:p:439-457:n:3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.