IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/jmbace/v25y2017i3p55-77n1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Business History in Poland: Current State and Future Potential

Author

Listed:
  • Pikos Anna
  • Olejniczak Tomasz

    (Kozminski University, Department of Management, 59 Jagiellonska str., 03-301 Warsaw, Poland)

Abstract

Purpose: This article explores the gap in the business history literature devoted to Central and Eastern Europe and discusses the potential of conducting business history research in Poland. Methodology: This is an explorative and tentative study based on a recently developed database of 387 Polish companies which are more than 100 years old. Findings: The article explores the reasons behind the lack of business history debate in the Polish academia and discusses its future potential. We argue that given the size of population and a unique historical context, the Polish sample is worth studying as it can provide valuable contributions to well established debates in the field of business history debates covering issues such as continuity, longevity, and survival strategies. Research limitations and implications: This is an explorative and tentative study and therefore has several limitations, including a limited scope of companies included in the database, sources of data, and poor quality of corporate archives. Originality and value: This is the first article explicitly discussing the potential of conducting business history studies in the context of empirical data concerning Polish long-lived companies.

Suggested Citation

  • Pikos Anna & Olejniczak Tomasz, 2017. "Business History in Poland: Current State and Future Potential," Journal of Management and Business Administration. Central Europe, Sciendo, vol. 25(3), pages 55-77, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:jmbace:v:25:y:2017:i:3:p:55-77:n:1
    DOI: 10.7206/jmba.ce.2450-7814.199
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.7206/jmba.ce.2450-7814.199
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.7206/jmba.ce.2450-7814.199?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mayer N. Zald, 1993. "Organization Studies as a Scientific and Humanistic Enterprise: Toward a Reconceptualization of the Foundations of the Field," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 4(4), pages 513-528, November.
    2. Williamson, Harold F., 1966. "Business History and Economic History," The Journal of Economic History, Cambridge University Press, vol. 26(4), pages 407-417, December.
    3. Alfred Kieser, 1994. "Why Organization Theory Needs Historical Analyses—And How This Should Be Performed," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 5(4), pages 608-620, November.
    4. Guglielmo Meardi & Juliusz Gardawski & Oscar Molina, 2015. "The dynamics of tripartism in post-democratic transitions: comparative lessons from Spain and Poland," Business History, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(3), pages 398-417, April.
    5. Peter Clark & Michael Rowlinson, 2004. "The Treatment of History in Organisation Studies: Towards an 'Historic Turn'?," Business History, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(3), pages 331-352.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Amy L. Fraher, 2022. "Disobeying Orders’ as Responsible Leadership: Revisiting Churchill, Percival and the Fall of Singapore," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 175(2), pages 247-263, January.
    2. Nathalie Mitev & François-Xavier de Vaujany, 2012. "Seizing the Opportunity: Towards a Historiography of Information Systems," Post-Print halshs-00671690, HAL.
    3. Pikos Anna, 2018. "Continuity of Narratives: Reinterpretations of Polish Business History," Journal of Management and Business Administration. Central Europe, Sciendo, vol. 26(4), pages 47-63, December.
    4. Ilgaz Arikan & Asli M. Arikan & Oded Shenkar, 2020. "Nation‐dyadic history and cross‐border corporate deals: Role of conflict, trade, generational distance, and professional education," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(3), pages 422-466, March.
    5. repec:bla:jomstd:v:47:y:2010:i:s1:p:837-858 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Marie-Laure Salles-Djelic & Rodolphe Durand, 2010. "Strong in the Morning, Dead in the Evening," Post-Print hal-01891973, HAL.
    7. Iglesias, Oriol & Ind, Nicholas & Schultz, Majken, 2020. "History matters: The role of history in corporate brand strategy," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 63(1), pages 51-60.
    8. Benjamin Cole & Preeta Banerjee, 2013. "Morally Contentious Technology-Field Intersections: The Case of Biotechnology in the United States," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 115(3), pages 555-574, July.
    9. Robert J. David & Wesley D. Sine & Heather A. Haveman, 2013. "Seizing Opportunity in Emerging Fields: How Institutional Entrepreneurs Legitimated the Professional Form of Management Consulting," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(2), pages 356-377, April.
    10. Peter J. Buckley, 2016. "Historical Research Approaches to the Analysis of Internationalisation," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 56(6), pages 879-900, December.
    11. Leonardo M. Klüppel & Lamar Pierce & Jason A. Snyder, 2018. "Perspective—The Deep Historical Roots of Organization and Strategy: Traumatic Shocks, Culture, and Institutions," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(4), pages 702-721, August.
    12. Shenkar Oded & Arikan Ilgaz, 2010. "Business as International Politics: Drawing Insights from Nation-State to Inter-Firm Alliances," Business and Politics, De Gruyter, vol. 11(4), pages 1-33, January.
    13. Tomoaki Sakano & Arie Y. Lewin, 1999. "Impact of CEO Succession in Japanese Companies: A Coevolutionary Perspective," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 10(5), pages 654-671, October.
    14. Ilgaz Arikan & Oded Shenkar, 2022. "Neglected elements: What we should cover more of in international business research," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 53(7), pages 1484-1507, September.
    15. Nicholas S. Argyres & Alfredo De Massis & Nicolai J. Foss & Federico Frattini & Geoffrey Jones & Brian S. Silverman, 2020. "History‐informed strategy research: The promise of history and historical research methods in advancing strategy scholarship," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(3), pages 343-368, March.
    16. repec:hal:journl:hal-01070044 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Sefa Awaworyi Churchill & Simon Chang & Russell Smyth & Trong-Anh Trinh, 2024. "The Long Run Gender Origins of Entrepreneurship: Evidence from Australia's Convict History," Monash Economics Working Papers 2024-11, Monash University, Department of Economics.
    18. Lorena Bezerra de Souza Matos & Ana Sílvia Rocha Ipiranga, 2017. "The translations and the organizing of scientific practices in R&D biotechnology [As translações no organizar das práticas científicas em P & D biotecnológica]," Post-Print hal-02952214, HAL.
    19. Augustine, Grace L. & Piazza, Alessandro, 2021. "Category Evolution under Conditions of Stigma: The Segregation of Abortion Provision into Specialist Clinics in the United States," OSF Preprints fzqa6, Center for Open Science.
    20. Gino Cattani & Roger L. M. Dunbar & Zur Shapira, 2013. "Value Creation and Knowledge Loss: The Case of Cremonese Stringed Instruments," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(3), pages 813-830, June.
    21. repec:fan:istois:v:html10.3280/isto2023-047002 is not listed on IDEAS
    22. Landoni, Matteo & ogilvie, dt, 2019. "Convergence of innovation policies in the European aerospace industry (1960–2000)," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 174-184.
    23. Eero Vaara & Juha-Antti Lamberg, 2016. "Taking historical embeddedness seriously : Three historical approaches to advance strategy process and practice research," Post-Print hal-02276732, HAL.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:jmbace:v:25:y:2017:i:3:p:55-77:n:1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.