IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/gfkmir/v8y2016i1p42-45n7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Communicating Eco-Friendly Benefits: Why Accidental Improvements May Be Better Received by Consumers

Author

Listed:
  • Newman George E.

    (Professor of Organizational Behavior, Yale School of Management, New Haven, CT, USA)

  • Dhar Ravi

    (George Rogers Clark Professor of Management and Marketing, Yale School of Management, New Haven, CT, USA)

  • Gorlin Margarita

    (PhD candidate at the Yale School of Management, New Haven, CT, USA)

Abstract

Doing good does not necessarily imply doing well for a company. Ironically, in the case of green products it can even be quite the contrary. Deliberately enhancing a product with environmental benefits to make it more appealing may actually lead to a decrease in consumer interest because consumers suspect that quality was reduced on other dimensions. Even explicitly stating that the company cares about both the environment and quality is not sufficient to overcome consumers’ skepticism, according to our experiments. Fortunately, there are ways to communicate environmental improvements successfully. Companies improving a basic product feature like making something more eco-friendly should either position the improvement as unintended or emphasize that the primary goal is improving the quality of the product. Focusing on eco-conscious market segments also helps to avoid harm and might even be beneficial. Improvements on dimensions that are not inherent to a product’s composition, like fair trade or other social benefits, turned out to be less critical in the experiments.

Suggested Citation

  • Newman George E. & Dhar Ravi & Gorlin Margarita, 2016. "Communicating Eco-Friendly Benefits: Why Accidental Improvements May Be Better Received by Consumers," NIM Marketing Intelligence Review, Sciendo, vol. 8(1), pages 42-45, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:gfkmir:v:8:y:2016:i:1:p:42-45:n:7
    DOI: 10.1515/gfkmir-2016-0007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/gfkmir-2016-0007
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/gfkmir-2016-0007?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:gfkmir:v:8:y:2016:i:1:p:42-45:n:7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.