IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/gfkmir/v6y2014i1p28-33n1005.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Breaking Up is Hard to Do: The Ups and Downs of Divorcing Brands

Author

Listed:
  • Fournier Susan

    (University, U.S.)

Abstract

Relationships with brands are like relationships between people. Even when they were very close, they can fail for diverse reasons. The disadoption of favorite brands doesn't happen overnight. It tends to be an extended, often painful process and not a clear-cut, one-off event. Breakups are not isolated to the person and the brand. Friends and family often get involved and offer their opinions and advice. Other brand relationships are also affected by the disconnection, and this can speed up or delay the process of breaking up. The brand relationship changes its form and can go from being a best friend to a platonic love, a distant friend, a stalker or even an enemy. A breakup is never the end of the relationship. Rather, it redefines the relationship and is part of a never-ending cycle of change. If the former relationship is perceived positively, it is easier to eventually activate and intensify it. If negative aspects prevail, negative word of mouth is a danger and companies must be able to counter it. Some relationships reach a point of no return. But there are also customers who might regret having abandoned a brand. With some sensitivity, it might be possible to win them back.

Suggested Citation

  • Fournier Susan, 2014. "Breaking Up is Hard to Do: The Ups and Downs of Divorcing Brands," NIM Marketing Intelligence Review, Sciendo, vol. 6(1), pages 28-33.
  • Handle: RePEc:vrs:gfkmir:v:6:y:2014:i:1:p:28-33:n:1005
    DOI: 10.2478/gfkmir-2014-0005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/gfkmir-2014-0005
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/gfkmir-2014-0005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:gfkmir:v:6:y:2014:i:1:p:28-33:n:1005. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.