IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/gfkmir/v6y2014i1p22-27n1004.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Feels Right … Go Ahead? When to Trust Your Feelings in Judgments and Decisions

Author

Listed:
  • Tuan Pham Michel

    (Columbia University, New York, USA)

Abstract

Not only are subjective feelings an integral part of many judgments and decisions, they can even lead to improved decisions and better predictions. Individuals who have learned to trust their feelings performed better in economic-negotiation games than their rational-thinking opponents. But emotions are not just relevant in negotiations and decisions. They also play a decisive role in forecasting future events. Candidates who trusted their feelings made better predictions than people with less emotional confidence. Emotions contain valuable information about the world around us. This information is not as readily available in our mind as hard facts but rather lies in the background of our conscious attention. In negotiation situations like the ultimatum game, feelings provide an intuitive sense of what offer is about right and what offer is too high or too low. But feelings also summarize statistical relationships among things that, on the surface, may seem disconnected. These statistical relationships make more probable futures feel more right than less probable futures. However, researchers warn that you should not always trust your feelings. Feelings that tend to help are those based on general knowledge, not those based on easy-to-verbalize local knowledge.

Suggested Citation

  • Tuan Pham Michel, 2014. "Feels Right … Go Ahead? When to Trust Your Feelings in Judgments and Decisions," NIM Marketing Intelligence Review, Sciendo, vol. 6(1), pages 22-27.
  • Handle: RePEc:vrs:gfkmir:v:6:y:2014:i:1:p:22-27:n:1004
    DOI: 10.2478/gfkmir-2014-0004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/gfkmir-2014-0004
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/gfkmir-2014-0004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:gfkmir:v:6:y:2014:i:1:p:22-27:n:1004. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.