IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/gfkmir/v12y2020i1p10-17n2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Crowd Innovation: The Philosopher’s Stone, a Silver Bullet, or Pandora’s Box?

Author

Listed:
  • Matzler Kurt

    (Professor of Strategic Management, University of Innsbruck, Austria)

Abstract

All kinds of organizations have tapped into crowds to find individuals who can help them solve problems and develop innovations. Crowdsourcing makes it possible to attract a highly diverse audience that approaches innovation challenges from new angles. To develop groundbreaking innovations, companies are after exceptional ideas – and those are more likely to be found in large crowds rather than small internal groups. Furthermore, participants in crowd projects select the challenges they are really interested in themselves, due to which their motivation and engagement levels tend to be high. In collaborative crowdsourcing projects, new and better ideas can emerge when crowds share information freely, build on other ideas and are able to accumulate and recombine different concepts. Despite these advantages there are risks: costs and effort might be underestimated, or organizations might fail to control their crowds. And the crowd can sometimes also be wrong. Managers need to carefully analyze which solutions they seek and whether their problems can be solved through crowdsourcing. Not all innovation needs are suitable for open innovation, but crowdsourcing can have remarkable success if applied wisely to the right challenges.

Suggested Citation

  • Matzler Kurt, 2020. "Crowd Innovation: The Philosopher’s Stone, a Silver Bullet, or Pandora’s Box?," NIM Marketing Intelligence Review, Sciendo, vol. 12(1), pages 10-17, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:vrs:gfkmir:v:12:y:2020:i:1:p:10-17:n:2
    DOI: 10.2478/nimmir-2020-0002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/nimmir-2020-0002
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/nimmir-2020-0002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:gfkmir:v:12:y:2020:i:1:p:10-17:n:2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.