IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/gfkmir/v11y2019i2p24-29n3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Let the Machine Decide: When Consumers Trust or Distrust Algorithms

Author

Listed:
  • Castelo Noah

    (Professor of Marketing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada)

  • Bos Maarten W.

    (Senior Research Scientist, Snap Inc., Santa Monica, CA, USA)

  • Lehmann Donald

    (George E. Warren Professor of Business, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA)

Abstract

Thanks to the rapid progress in the field of artificial intelligence algorithms are able to accomplish an increasingly comprehensive list of tasks, and often they achieve better results than human experts. Nevertheless, many consumers have ambivalent feelings towards algorithms and tend to trust humans more than they trust machines. Especially when tasks are perceived as subjective, consumers often assume that algorithms will be less effective, even if this belief is getting more and more inaccurate. To encourage algorithm adoption, managers should provide empirical evidence of the algorithm’s superior performance relative to humans. Given that consumers trust in the cognitive capabilities of algorithms, another way to increase trust is to demonstrate that these capabilities are relevant for the task in question. Further, explaining that algorithms can detect and understand human emotions can enhance adoption of algorithms for subjective tasks.

Suggested Citation

  • Castelo Noah & Bos Maarten W. & Lehmann Donald, 2019. "Let the Machine Decide: When Consumers Trust or Distrust Algorithms," NIM Marketing Intelligence Review, Sciendo, vol. 11(2), pages 24-29, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:gfkmir:v:11:y:2019:i:2:p:24-29:n:3
    DOI: 10.2478/nimmir-2019-0012
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/nimmir-2019-0012
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/nimmir-2019-0012?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:gfkmir:v:11:y:2019:i:2:p:24-29:n:3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.