IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/gfkmir/v10y2018i1p40-45n7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Consumers’ Styles of Thinking Can Control Brand Dilution

Author

Listed:
  • Monga Alokparna Basu

    (Professor of Marketing, Rutgers Business School – Newark and New Brunswick, USA)

  • Hsu Liwu

    (Assistant Professor of Marketing, College of Business, University of Alabama in Huntsville, USA)

Abstract

Understanding consumers’ ways of thinking can help identify strategies to limit brand damage and elicit more favorable reactions from disapproving consumers. Analytic thinkers’ beliefs about a brand are diluted when they see negative information; those of holistic thinkers remain unaffected. While both analytic and holistic thinkers blame the brand equally for quality and manufacturing problems, holistic thinkers are more likely to blame contextual factors outside of the brand than analytic thinkers. This ability of holistic thinkers to focus on the outside context is the reason why their brand beliefs are not diluted. State-of-the-art crisis management should be proactive vis-à-vis potentially negative events. Crisis communications that highlight contextual factors as triggers of negative incidents offer a powerful mechanism to restrict brand damage. Additionally, elaborational messages that clarify the nature of the brand extension can curb negative thoughts from analytic consumers and boost their responses.

Suggested Citation

  • Monga Alokparna Basu & Hsu Liwu, 2018. "How Consumers’ Styles of Thinking Can Control Brand Dilution," NIM Marketing Intelligence Review, Sciendo, vol. 10(1), pages 40-45, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:vrs:gfkmir:v:10:y:2018:i:1:p:40-45:n:7
    DOI: 10.2478/gfkmir-2018-0007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/gfkmir-2018-0007
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/gfkmir-2018-0007?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:gfkmir:v:10:y:2018:i:1:p:40-45:n:7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.