IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/founma/v5y2013i1p9n5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Crowdsourcing As A Method Of Obtaining Information

Author

Listed:
  • Przybylska Natalia

    (The Faculty of Economics and Management, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Poland)

Abstract

The aim of this article is to analyse and describe a new trend in obtaining information and solving problems, which is crowdsourcing. Contemporary enterprises face enormous challenges, which are connected with omnipresent changes occurring in the functioning of societies and economies all over the world. Crowdsourcing is a very complex and constantly evolving phenomenon. It is an open subject of multiple discussions in which, due to its multiple factors and variable applications, it is being differently defined. Growing usage of this phenomenon prompts scientists for undertaking research and analysis of this issue as it is strictly connected with dynamically changing attitudes of, not only, entrepreneurs, but also their surroundings. The prime driving force behind undertaking this subject is a fast development of technology, Web 2.0, or globalisation. The mechanism of crowdsourcing’s functioning has been known for ages; however, it was named as a tool for modern enterprises 10 years ago. During that short period of time crowdsourcing has gained the acceptance of a number of people all over the world. The challenge for the present research is, as well, to indicate advantages and underline the essence of proper managing of crowdsourcing in enterprises, what involves a number of aspects. The described solution is still gaining more and more proponents; however, planned inappropriately, may cause completely reversible effect than the desired one. In this article, descriptions of worldwide ventures, which apply crowdsourcing, in Poland as well, and the results of the newest research on the phenomenon were included.

Suggested Citation

  • Przybylska Natalia, 2013. "Crowdsourcing As A Method Of Obtaining Information," Foundations of Management, Sciendo, vol. 5(1), pages 43-51, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:founma:v:5:y:2013:i:1:p:9:n:5
    DOI: 10.2478/fman-2014-0005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/fman-2014-0005
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/fman-2014-0005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. El-Sayed Abou-Zeid & Qianzhen Cheng, 2004. "The Effectiveness Of Innovation: A Knowledge Management Approach," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 8(03), pages 261-274.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dimitrios Kafetzopoulos & Evangelos Psomas, 2016. "ORGANISATIONAL LEARNING, NON-TECHNICAL INNOVATION AND CUSTOMER SATISFACTION OF SMEs," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 20(03), pages 1-28, April.
    2. Yingmiao Qian & Mengjun Wang & Yang Zou & Ruoyu Jin & Ruijia Yuan & Qinge Wang, 2019. "Understanding the Double-Level Influence of Guanxi on Construction Innovation in China: The Mediating Role of Interpersonal Knowledge Sharing and the Cross-Level Moderating Role of Inter-Organizationa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-19, March.
    3. Aleena Syed & Humna Sohail & Sarmad Ejaz & Hafiz Ahmed Ullah, 2020. "Direct and Indirect effect of Knowledge Management Practices on Firm Innovation via Knowledge Application," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 10(4), pages 110-118.
    4. Singh, Sanjay Kumar & Gupta, Shivam & Busso, Donatella & Kamboj, Shampy, 2021. "Top management knowledge value, knowledge sharing practices, open innovation and organizational performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 788-798.
    5. Babica Viktorija & Sceulovs Deniss, 2019. "Public Procurement of Innovation: Selection of the Sustainable Alternative," Economics and Business, Sciendo, vol. 33(1), pages 233-246, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:founma:v:5:y:2013:i:1:p:9:n:5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.