IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/eurcou/v5y2013i3p182-196n1001.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of the EU Territorial Differences in Terms of Natural Conditions with Special View of Czech Nuts 2 Regions

Author

Listed:
  • Hlavsa Tomáš

    (Institute of Agricultural Economics and Information Prague, Mánesova 75, 120 56 Praha 2, Czech Republic)

  • Čapkovičová Andrea

    (Institute of Agricultural Economics and Information Prague, Mánesova 75, 120 56 Praha 2, Czech Republic)

Abstract

This paper analyses differences and similarities between the NUTS 2 regions of the European Union in terms of natural conditions with the subsequent evaluation of differences in land use, size structure, enterprise focus and selected economic indicators. The paper is also focused on the evaluation of the position of regions of the Czech Republic. NUTS 2 EU regions were classified into four groups, where the first represented favorable conditions for agriculture, on the other side the other group with conditions unsuitable for intensive agriculture - mountainous areas and the last two groups represented a transition between them. Czech regions were found in all groups except mountainous areas. Based on the analysis can we say that between clusters were found significant differences in the structure of farms, size of the enterprises, business focus but differences were not found in the economic indicators.

Suggested Citation

  • Hlavsa Tomáš & Čapkovičová Andrea, 2013. "Analysis of the EU Territorial Differences in Terms of Natural Conditions with Special View of Czech Nuts 2 Regions," European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 5(3), pages 182-196.
  • Handle: RePEc:vrs:eurcou:v:5:y:2013:i:3:p:182-196:n:1001
    DOI: 10.2478/euco-2013-0012
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/euco-2013-0012
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/euco-2013-0012?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:eurcou:v:5:y:2013:i:3:p:182-196:n:1001. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.