IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/econom/v4y2016i2p113-132n8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Tourists and Local Stakeholders Attitudes Towards Offer and Market Position of Tourist Destination Budva

Author

Listed:
  • Marković Ana Tripković

    (Fakultet za biznis i turizam Budva, Montenegro)

  • Rađenović Miško

    (The Academy of knowledge in Budva, Montenegro)

  • Murić Anisa

    (Faculty of Business and Tourism Budva, Montenegro)

Abstract

There are various definitions of tourist destination. All of them define tourist destination as an area with specific tourist facilities and attractions, (primary and secondary elements) which tourists choose as their journey goal. Budva individually represents the largest tourist destination due to number of arrivals and overnight stays. During its life cycle Budva has gone through different phases as a tourist destination. This thesis implies that it is not enough to use only common quantitative indicator of visitor number to define proper the position of tourist destination and predict further development. This text is based on a comparative analysis of the attitudes of tourists and local stakeholders in the three field researches, conducted in the period between 2015 and 2016. The thesis comes to the conclusion that the actual growth is based on meeting the needs of existing markets and tourists. On the other side, aspect of desired market position disagrees with scores of tourist offer elements- which should be input for improvement and preparation for the next stage in the destination development.

Suggested Citation

  • Marković Ana Tripković & Rađenović Miško & Murić Anisa, 2016. "Tourists and Local Stakeholders Attitudes Towards Offer and Market Position of Tourist Destination Budva," Economics, Sciendo, vol. 4(2), pages 113-132, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:vrs:econom:v:4:y:2016:i:2:p:113-132:n:8
    DOI: 10.1515/eoik-2017-0008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/eoik-2017-0008
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/eoik-2017-0008?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    tourism; tourist destination; tourist offer; Budva; Z32 Tourism and Development;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Z32 - Other Special Topics - - Tourism Economics - - - Tourism and Development

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:econom:v:4:y:2016:i:2:p:113-132:n:8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.