IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/econom/v12y2024i1p71-100n3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Role of Stress Tests in Enhancing Bank Transparency: A Comparative Study of Islamic and Conventional Banks

Author

Listed:
  • Khammassi Ines

    (College of Business Administration, King Faisal University, Al Ahsa 31982, Saudi Arabia)

  • Boufateh Talel

    (Department of Quantitative Methods at the High Business School of Tunis, University of Manouba (Tunisia))

  • Naoui Kamel

    (Department of Finance at the High Business School of Tunis, University of Manouba (Tunisia))

  • Alrawad Mahmaod

    (College of Business Administration, King Faisal University, Al Ahsa 31982, Saudi Arabia)

  • Lutfi Abdalwali

    (College of Business Administration, King Faisal University, Al Ahsa 31982, Saudi Arabia)

Abstract

The global financial crisis highlighted the crucial role of stress tests in evaluating a bank’s resilience to severe economic shocks. Accordingly, the purpose of the study was to examine the contribution of stress tests to credit risk in terms of hedging banking opacity and improving financial resistance against negative shocks in MENA countries, observed for the period from 2012 to 2022. Furthermore,, this study explores the impact of stress tests on enhancing bank transparency, particularly within the contexts of Islamic and conventional banking systems using the Panel-VAR and GMM approach. A conceptual framework is established to explain the connection between stress testing and bank transparency, emphasizing on the mechanisms through which stress tests can promote greater disclosure and accountability. A comparative analysis of stress testing practices across both banking sectors reveals similarities and distinctions in scenario selection, modeling techniques, and disclosure practices. In-depth case studies of Islamic and conventional banks illustrate the practical application of stress testing in fostering transparency. These results show that stress tests produce information about credit risk exposure and about the real conditions of financial institutions. Therefore, more transparency on bank losses and risks would have also enabled bank regulators to focus more attention on financial institutions and react early to take “corrective measures”. Policy recommendations are drawn to enhance the effectiveness of stress testing in promoting transparency and financial stability within both Islamic and conventional banking sectors. This study contributes to a deeper understanding of stress testing’s role in fostering a more resilient and stable financial system.

Suggested Citation

  • Khammassi Ines & Boufateh Talel & Naoui Kamel & Alrawad Mahmaod & Lutfi Abdalwali, 2024. "The Role of Stress Tests in Enhancing Bank Transparency: A Comparative Study of Islamic and Conventional Banks," Economics, Sciendo, vol. 12(1), pages 71-100, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:vrs:econom:v:12:y:2024:i:1:p:71-100:n:3
    DOI: 10.2478/eoik-2024-0003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/eoik-2024-0003
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/eoik-2024-0003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Stress tests; Panel-VAR; credit risk; Islamic banking; macroeconomic and specific shocks; financial stability;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G21 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Banks; Other Depository Institutions; Micro Finance Institutions; Mortgages
    • C22 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Single Equation Models; Single Variables - - - Time-Series Models; Dynamic Quantile Regressions; Dynamic Treatment Effect Models; Diffusion Processes
    • D81 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty
    • G32 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Financing Policy; Financial Risk and Risk Management; Capital and Ownership Structure; Value of Firms; Goodwill
    • G14 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Information and Market Efficiency; Event Studies; Insider Trading

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:econom:v:12:y:2024:i:1:p:71-100:n:3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.