IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/econom/v11y2023i1p233-249n2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment of the efficiency of use of EPS by business

Author

Listed:
  • Volvach Olena

    (Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv, Ukraine)

Abstract

As the world became more digitalized thanks to the Internet, it led to the creation of Electronic Payment Systems that are now used to seeing all over the world, but there is a need for estimation the return on development and implementation of EPSs. The research goal is to develop an approach based on optimization modeling for the assessment of the efficiency of implementation and the use of electronic payment systems by Ukrainian and international businesses for their day-by-day operations. The article also analyzed different classifications of EPS and determined several types of methodology for the evaluation of the effectiveness of the EPS (absolute and relative to business results and costs). Using the optimization model and system analysis, the authors proposed the algorithm for the estimation of profit from EPS implementation (both separate EPS or portfolio of EPSs) and make an experiment for one of the EPS for the period of 2023-2026. The optimization model includes revenue from EPS, as well as salary, rent, and infrastructure costs, which helps to improve the results of EPS implementation by adapting of transaction’s tariff. Authors also described the process of solving optimization task for determining effective tariff per 1 transaction, taking into account marketing information.

Suggested Citation

  • Volvach Olena, 2023. "Assessment of the efficiency of use of EPS by business," Economics, Sciendo, vol. 11(1), pages 233-249, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:vrs:econom:v:11:y:2023:i:1:p:233-249:n:2
    DOI: 10.2478/eoik-2023-0003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/eoik-2023-0003
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/eoik-2023-0003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Emrah Oney & Gizem Oksuzoglu Guven & Wajid Hussain Rizvi, 2017. "The determinants of electronic payment systems usage from consumers’ perspective," Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(1), pages 394-415, January.
    2. Iviane Ramos-de-Luna & Francisco Montoro-Ríos & Francisco Liébana-Cabanillas, 2016. "Determinants of the intention to use NFC technology as a payment system: an acceptance model approach," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 293-314, May.
    3. Humphrey, David B & Kim, Moshe & Vale, Bent, 2001. "Realizing the Gains from Electronic Payments: Costs, Pricing, and Payment Choice," Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 33(2), pages 216-234, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Guerino Ardizzi & Massimiliano Cologgi, 2022. "Business models and pricing strategies in the market for ATM withdrawals," Temi di discussione (Economic working papers) 23, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
    2. Magnus Willesson, 2009. "Pricing of card payment services in Scandinavian banking," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(3), pages 387-399, March.
    3. Bolt, Wilko & Tieman, Alexander F., 2008. "Heavily skewed pricing in two-sided markets," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 26(5), pages 1250-1255, September.
    4. Scholnick, Barry & Massoud, Nadia & Saunders, Anthony & Carbo-Valverde, Santiago & Rodríguez-Fernández, Francisco, 2008. "The economics of credit cards, debit cards and ATMs: A survey and some new evidence," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 32(8), pages 1468-1483, August.
    5. Ueda, Kozo, 2024. "Effects of bank branch/ATM consolidations on cash demand: Evidence from bank account transaction data in Japan," Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    6. Samson Nwankwo & Sunday Ajemunigbohun & Ayodele Iyun, 2015. "Empirical Examination Of The Implementation Of Electronic Payment Systems In Service Delivery Of Insurance Companies In Nigeria," European Journal of Business and Economics, Central Bohemia University, vol. 10(2), pages 6841:10-684, January.
    7. Joanna Stavins & Huijia Wu, 2017. "Payment discounts and surcharges: the role of consumer preferences," Working Papers 17-4, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston.
    8. Iftekhar Hasan & Heiko Schmiedel & Liang Song, 2012. "Returns to Retail Banking and Payments," Journal of Financial Services Research, Springer;Western Finance Association, vol. 41(3), pages 163-195, June.
    9. Snellman, Heli, 2006. "Automated teller machine network market structure and cash usage," Bank of Finland Scientific Monographs, Bank of Finland, volume 0, number sm2006_038, July.
    10. Francisco J. Callado-Muñoz & Jana Hromcová & Natalia Utrero-González, 2012. "Transformation of payment systems: the case of European Union enlargement," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(18), pages 1787-1791, December.
    11. Kari Kemppainen, 2004. "Competition and regulation in European retail payment systems," Microeconomics 0404008, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Vânia G. Silva & Esmeralda A. Ramalho & Carlos R. Vieira, 2017. "The Use of Cheques in the European Union: A Cross-Country Analysis," Open Economies Review, Springer, vol. 28(3), pages 581-602, July.
    13. Humphrey, David B. & Vale, Bent, 2004. "Scale economies, bank mergers, and electronic payments: A spline function approach," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 28(7), pages 1671-1696, July.
    14. Xuechao Sui & Xianhui Geng, 2021. "Continuous usage intention to e-transaction cards in wholesale markets of agriproducts: empirical evidence from China," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 1-13, December.
    15. Kemppainen, Kari, 2003. "Competition and regulation in European retail payment systems," Bank of Finland Research Discussion Papers 16/2003, Bank of Finland.
    16. repec:zbw:bofrdp:2005_016 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Wilko Bolt & David Humphrey & Roland Uittenbogaard, 2008. "Transaction Pricing and the Adoption of Electronic Payments: A Cross-Country Comparison," International Journal of Central Banking, International Journal of Central Banking, vol. 4(1), pages 89-123, March.
    18. Schuh, Scott & Stavins, Joanna, 2010. "Why are (some) consumers (finally) writing fewer checks? The role of payment characteristics," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 34(8), pages 1745-1758, August.
    19. David Bounie & Abel François, 2006. "Les déterminants de la détention et de l’usage des instruments de paiement : éléments théoriques et empiriques," Revue d'Économie Financière, Programme National Persée, vol. 83(2), pages 159-176.
    20. Kjersti-Gro Lindquist, 2002. "The Effect of New Technology in Payment Services on Banks' Intermediation," 10th International Conference on Panel Data, Berlin, July 5-6, 2002 B3-2, International Conferences on Panel Data.
    21. Abdullai, Besim, 2009. "Electronic Payment Instruments use, as perceived by consumers in Macedonia," MPRA Paper 16080, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 21 Mar 2009.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    electronic payment systems; efficiency; optimization; evaluation; implementation;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G14 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Information and Market Efficiency; Event Studies; Insider Trading
    • G31 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Capital Budgeting; Fixed Investment and Inventory Studies
    • O31 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives
    • C10 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - General
    • C13 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Estimation: General
    • C52 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - Model Evaluation, Validation, and Selection

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:econom:v:11:y:2023:i:1:p:233-249:n:2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.