IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/ecocul/v21y2024i2p138-149n1009.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Film Policy and Film Production: The Potential of Baltic Co-Productions and New Film Fund

Author

Listed:
  • Dabrovolskas Audrius

    (Turiba University, Riga, Latvia)

  • Cane Renate

    (Turiba University, Riga, Latvia)

Abstract

The film industry can be considered the most important in creative industries since it possesses the characteristics of industrial organization, a high degree of demand uncertainty, contractual agreements, and business practices. What is more, the film industry strongly influences the other sub-sectors, because of the broad-based advantages that it delivers in terms of employment and economic growth. On the other hand, the economic value of creative industries does not arise from their relative contribution to economic value, but from the co-ordination of new ideas and technologies thereby influencing change in economic and cultural processes. Since European film industries are fragmented, there is a constant need to rethink possible model for their continuous growth. This is especially relevant in the context of smaller film industries in Europe such as in the Baltic States, because their budgets for film production are relatively small compared to bigger film industries. Therefore, in order to foster new industry development, which would also reflect the regional context of the Baltic States and its location strengths, the potential of co-productions - mission-economy approach is proposed as it emphasizes market co-creation, co-shaping, partnerships between business and public sector and other managerial and technological innovations. Research purpose and objectives. The aim of the study is to provide new recommendations for the film centres in Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia regarding film policy based on the mission-economy approach. In order to achieve the aim two objectives were set: 1) to analyse the current financial support model for the national film production and co-productions in the Baltic film industries and 2) to investigate whether the Baltic co-productions can have a new value for the audience. Design / Methodology / Approach. The study used both qualitative and quantitative methods for data extraction and analysis. Firstly, descriptive statistics as a method was used to analyse the financial support for national film production in Lithuanian, Latvian and Estonian film industries during 2018-2023 and the releases of co-produced films between the Baltic States. Furthermore, 6 semi-structured interviews with experts from the Baltic film industries were conducted. Findings. As a result of the research, the authors conclude that there is long-term potential in the Baltic co-production films, but they have to be more oriented towards the audience and reflect the genre as in the case of Nordic films. Moreover, financial support models for co-productions in the Baltic film industries are different in regard to applications and their management. Therefore, a potentially new “Baltic Film and TV Fund” could be established to foster regional co-productions. Originality / Value / Practical implications. As a result of the study, the authors have developed recommendations for the film policy that would reflect the new value of the Baltic co-productions. The results of the research can be used by the Lithuanian Film Centre, the National Film Centre of Latvia, and the Estonian Film Institute to continue establishing the “Baltic Film and TV Fund”. The research results will be partly used for further research within the framework of Audrius Dabrovolskas’ doctoral thesis.

Suggested Citation

  • Dabrovolskas Audrius & Cane Renate, 2024. "Film Policy and Film Production: The Potential of Baltic Co-Productions and New Film Fund," Economics and Culture, Sciendo, vol. 21(2), pages 138-149.
  • Handle: RePEc:vrs:ecocul:v:21:y:2024:i:2:p:138-149:n:1009
    DOI: 10.2478/jec-2024-0024
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/jec-2024-0024
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/jec-2024-0024?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Norbert Morawetz & Jane Hardy & Colin Haslam & Keith Randle, 2007. "Finance, Policy and Industrial Dynamics—The Rise of Co-productions in the Film Industry," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(4), pages 421-443.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michael Hoyler & Allan Watson, 2019. "Framing city networks through temporary projects: (Trans)national film production beyond ‘Global Hollywood’," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(5), pages 943-959, April.
    2. Xu Zhang & June Wang, 2021. "Transborder Film Production Between Mainland China and Hong Kong After CEPA: The Interplay Between Political Orientation and Market Forces," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 112(3), pages 239-255, July.
    3. Chi-Wei Su & Lu Liu & Kai-Hua Wang, 2020. "Do Bubble Behaviors Exist in Chinese Film Stocks?," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(4), pages 21582440209, December.
    4. Lorenzo Mizzau, 2014. "Constructing value for culture: The evolution of local cultural industriesÕ policies and governance in North-East Italy," Working Papers 02, Venice School of Management - Department of Management, Università Ca' Foscari Venezia.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    film policy; film production; creative industries; mission economy; Baltic film industries.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M1 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration
    • Z1 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics
    • Z11 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics - - - Economics of the Arts and Literature
    • Z18 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics - - - Public Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:ecocul:v:21:y:2024:i:2:p:138-149:n:1009. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.