IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/brcebe/v3y2017i1p446-449n58.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rationality Evaluation of Curriculum System of Groundwater Science and Engineering

Author

Listed:
  • Yahong Zhou

    (Hebei GEO University, School of Water Resources and Enviroment, Shijiazhuang, China Hebei Province Key Laboratory of Sustained Utilization and Development of Water Resources, Shijiazhuang, China Hebei Province Collaborative Innovation Center for Sustainable Utilization of Water Resources and Optimization of Industrial Structure, Shijiazhuang, China)

  • Rui Wang
  • Aihua Wei

    (GEO University, School of Water Resources and Enviroment, Shijiazhuang, China)

Abstract

The research object of this paper is the 66 students of Groundwater science and engineering in Heibei GEO University. Their 11 courses’ exam scores in grade 3 were analyzed by principal component analysis (PCA). The results show that the course system is basically reasonable, because most of the score of the curriculums in PC1 are consistent with each other. What’s more, the results show that the professional basic courses laid a good foundation for the development of other courses. At the same time, the weakness of the curriculums has been reflected during the study. The content of the professional practice may need to be adjusted because it failed to transform the theoretical knowledge to practical application.

Suggested Citation

  • Yahong Zhou & Rui Wang & Aihua Wei, 2017. "Rationality Evaluation of Curriculum System of Groundwater Science and Engineering," Balkan Region Conference on Engineering and Business Education, Sciendo, vol. 3(1), pages 446-449, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:brcebe:v:3:y:2017:i:1:p:446-449:n:58
    DOI: 10.1515/cplbu-2017-0058
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/cplbu-2017-0058
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/cplbu-2017-0058?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:brcebe:v:3:y:2017:i:1:p:446-449:n:58. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.