IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/bjeust/v7y2017i2p132-147n6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mitterrand and the Great European Design—From the Cold War to the European Union

Author

Listed:
  • Troitiño David Ramiro

    (Tallinn University of Technology, Akadeemia tee 3, Tallinn12618, Estonia)

  • Färber Karoline

    (University of Erfurt, Nordhäuser Straße 63, Erfurt99089, Germany)

  • Boiro Anni

    (London School of Economics and Political Science, LondonWC2A 2AE, United Kingdom)

Abstract

François Mitterrand had a leading role in directing the course for the European integration process. While he orchestrated the economic integration of Europe, he remained deeply opposed to further political integration within the Communities. This article researches Mitterrand’s rationale for his clear focus on economic affairs and develops his vision for the institutional setting of the European Union (EU). The focus of the article is allocated to four different perspectives that reflect the four pillars of Mitterrand’s European policy: the common currency, the establishment of a closely integrated and small Western European based EU, the development of the Social Europe and of a free trade area between Europe and Africa. It is argued that although EU institutions have been established based on Mitterrand’s design, today’s reality deviates from the conditions on which his plan was based. For Mitterrand, the ideal EU involved a deep-rooted Western Europe with France at its core and a loose association with Central and Eastern Europe. His perception resembles the current discussions of multi-speed Europe and the determination of France and Germany to proceed to the next stage of the integration process. Importantly, Mitterrand’s print can still be recognised in the EU’s social policy included in the treaties, yet still far from being implemented. Notably, like all of the French Presidents, Mitterrand developed a design for Africa in which an extensive free trade area between Europe and former French colonies were to be established. In this proposal, Germany was to be assigned the part of the economic engine behind the actualisation of the proposal, while France was to carry out the role of a required middle man of the transactions. To further assure France’s political predominance over the Communities, Mitterrand designed a common currency for a small number of homogenous Western-European states.

Suggested Citation

  • Troitiño David Ramiro & Färber Karoline & Boiro Anni, 2017. "Mitterrand and the Great European Design—From the Cold War to the European Union," TalTech Journal of European Studies, Sciendo, vol. 7(2), pages 132-147, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:vrs:bjeust:v:7:y:2017:i:2:p:132-147:n:6
    DOI: 10.1515/bjes-2017-0013
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/bjes-2017-0013
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/bjes-2017-0013?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Elizabeth Haywood, 1993. "The European Policy of Franqois Mitterrand," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(2), pages 269-282, June.
    2. Moravcsik, Andrew, 1991. "Negotiating the Single European Act: national interests and conventional statecraft in the European Community," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 45(1), pages 19-56, January.
    3. Menon, Anand, 2012. "The Oxford Handbook of the European Union," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199546282 edited by Jones, Erik & Weatherill, Stephen.
    4. Peter Lange, 1993. "Maastricht and the Social Protocol: Why Did They Do It?," Politics & Society, , vol. 21(1), pages 5-36, March.
    5. Julie Newton, 2013. "Gorbachev, Mitterrand, and the Emergence of the Post-Cold War Order in Europe," Europe-Asia Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 65(2), pages 290-320.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Thomas König & Thomas Bräuninger, 1998. "The Inclusiveness of European Decision Rules," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 10(1), pages 125-142, January.
    2. Mark Aspinwall, 1995. "International Integration or Internal Politics? Anatomy of a Single Market Measure," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 475-499, December.
    3. Richard Sherman, 2001. "Fairness and the Dynamic Stability of Institutions," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 45(3), pages 297-319, June.
    4. Henrik Scheller & Annegret Eppler, 2014. "European Disintegration – non-existing Phenomenon or a Blind Spot of European Integration Research? Preliminary Thoughts for a Research Agenda," Working Papers of the Vienna Institute for European integration research (EIF) 2, Institute for European integration research (EIF).
    5. Carsten Hefeker & Michael Neugart, 2016. "Policy deviations, uncertainty, and the European Court of Justice," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 42(3), pages 547-567, December.
    6. Daniele Schiliro, 2014. "Changes in Eurozone Governance after the Crisis and the Issue of Growth," International Journal of Social Science Studies, Redfame publishing, vol. 2(2), pages 110-119, April.
    7. Lily Gardner Feldman, 1994. "Germany and the EC: Realism and Responsibility," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 531(1), pages 25-43, January.
    8. Ronald D. Gelleny & Christopher J. Anderson, 2000. "The Economy, Accountability, and Public Support for the President of the European Commission," European Union Politics, , vol. 1(2), pages 173-200, June.
    9. Petra Bendel, 2015. "But it does move, doesn´t it? The debate on the allocation of refugees in Europe from a German point of view," Border Crossing, Transnational Press London, UK, vol. 2015(1503), pages 25-32, June.
    10. Philip Grech, 2017. "Undesired properties of the European Commission’s refugee distribution key," European Union Politics, , vol. 18(2), pages 212-238, June.
    11. Maher, Imelda & Stefan, Oana, 2019. "Delegation of powers and the rule of law: Energy justice in EU energy regulation," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 84-93.
    12. Beyers, Jan, 1998. "Where does supranationalism come from? Ideas floating through the working groups of the Council of the European Union," European Integration online Papers (EIoP), European Community Studies Association Austria (ECSA-A), vol. 2, November.
    13. Sarah Ciaglia & Clemens Fuest & Friedrich Heinemann, 2018. "What a feeling?! How to promote ‘European Identity’," EconPol Policy Reports 9, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich.
    14. repec:bla:jcmkts:v:47:y:2009:i::p:357-384 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Begg, Iain & Bongardt, Annette & Nicolaïdis, Kalypso & Torres, Francisco, 2015. "EMU and sustainable integration," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 65243, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    16. Mai, Nhat Chi, 2017. "From European Colony to a New Era: EU-Vietnam Relations - 1990-2017," OSF Preprints h5gk9, Center for Open Science.
    17. Emmanuelle Auriol & Antonio Estache & Liam Wren-Lewis, 2018. "Can Supranational Infrastructure Regulation Compensate for National Institutional Weaknesses?," Revue économique, Presses de Sciences-Po, vol. 69(6), pages 913-936.
    18. Gary Marks & Liesbet Hooghe & Kermit Blank, 1995. "European Integration and the State," EUI-RSCAS Working Papers 7, European University Institute (EUI), Robert Schuman Centre of Advanced Studies (RSCAS).
    19. Chong Ju Choi & Philip Cheng & Brian Hilton, 2004. "European Union: Economic Convergenceversus Social Mobility," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 95(4), pages 427-432.
    20. Thomas König & Simon Hug, 2000. "Ratifying Maastricht," European Union Politics, , vol. 1(1), pages 93-124, February.
    21. Susanne Lohmann, 1997. "Linkage Politics," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 41(1), pages 38-67, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:bjeust:v:7:y:2017:i:2:p:132-147:n:6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.