IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/admini/v72y2024i4p189-207n1011.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

This time is different? Lessons from past reform initiatives in the Irish health system

Author

Listed:
  • Weir Stephen

    (Institute of Public Administration, Ireland)

Abstract

The publication of the Sláintecare report in May 2017 is a landmark in Irish healthcare policy. For the first time in the history of the state, the Irish political system produced an agreed long-term vision for the health system. The Irish healthcare system has attracted considerable negative comment over a long period and satisfactory healthcare reform had appeared to be impossible to achieve. The history of Irish healthcare reform is replete with policy difficulties. This paper seeks to assess the likelihood that Sláintecare will be implemented given that it is the first long-term, multielectoral cycle healthcare initiative that is agreed by all the main political parties. The paper uses a game theoretic model developed by Dal Bó, Dal Bó, and Di Tella to develop an understanding of the impact of the electoral cycle on politicians and interest groups in negotiating and implementing healthcare reform. It uses a case-study methodology, with previous Irish healthcare reform initiatives as the unit of analysis. Finally, it shows that politicians are at a distinct disadvantage due to the short-term horizon imposed on them due to the electoral cycle and that the adoption of a long-term agreed policy, like Sláintecare, is more likely to be implemented.

Suggested Citation

  • Weir Stephen, 2024. "This time is different? Lessons from past reform initiatives in the Irish health system," Administration, Sciendo, vol. 72(4), pages 189-207.
  • Handle: RePEc:vrs:admini:v:72:y:2024:i:4:p:189-207:n:1011
    DOI: 10.2478/admin-2024-0033
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/admin-2024-0033
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/admin-2024-0033?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:admini:v:72:y:2024:i:4:p:189-207:n:1011. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.