IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrn/journl/y2015i1p22-31.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment Of Tenders of Public Procurement In Construction

Author

Listed:
  • Todor Raychev

    (Varna University of Economics)

Abstract

In the article there is discussed the development and use of indicators for the assessment of offers when there are held open procedures for the award of procurement contracts in construction under the criterion “best-value-for-money offer”. With a view to reducing the subjective factor in drawing up the methods for assessing the offers, it is suggested that there should be developed and set as compulsory - by entering those in the normative base - special complex methodologies for specific assessment by distinct group, each of which encompasses relatively homogeneous, in terms of content and character, public procurement contracts for construction at the municipal and state level.

Suggested Citation

  • Todor Raychev, 2015. "Assessment Of Tenders of Public Procurement In Construction," Business & Management Compass, University of Economics Varna, issue 1, pages 22-31.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrn:journl:y:2015:i:1:p:22-31
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://journal.ue-varna.bg/uploads/20150515104911_15191699625555cf2759204.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    methodology; indicators; public procurement; construction;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H57 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - Procurement

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrn:journl:y:2015:i:1:p:22-31. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Yana Doneva (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/uevarbg.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.